A Comparative Study of Criminological Approaches and International Criminal Law in Terrorist Acts In Conflict with the interests of the Main Actors in International Relations

Terrorism is undoubtedly one of the common pains of humanity in modern times, which requires interdisciplinary and at the same time purely scientific studies to explain the various dimensions of this ominous phenomenon, which is against international peace and security, for scientific thought and its roots to be revealed. Given the proliferation of security approaches and the means at the disposal of such institutions in the international system, this claim must be made. In practice, the claim that terrorist groups spontaneously commit certain terrorist acts is quite a simple look at the issue.

Due to the complex nature of terrorism, the present study was conducted in terms of collecting information by documentary method and by studying domestic laws and international conventions as well as valid sources and the obtained information was analyzed descriptively-analytically. Is.

In this article, while maintaining the interdisciplinary approach to research, we seek to find a convincing answer to the question of how the most important approaches to international criminology and international criminal law based on the interests of governments affecting terrorism can be identified and redefined? In response, it should be said that the results show that a number of criminological approaches and a number of political variables have an important role in the instrumental use of terrorism by governments and in general an undeniable role in the exploitation of terrorist acts..