Examining the testimony of a beggar

Note 2 Article 1313 BC, like the famous jurists, has not accepted the testimony of beggars, who have made begging their profession; However, some jurists have accepted the testimony of a beggar whose work is not associated with haram. 1) - Disagreement in the interpretation of "Al-Sa'il al-Dhi Bakfa" which is mentioned in the narrations for not accepting his testimony. (2) - The difference between begging and not being forbidden. (3) - Assuming that begging is not forbidden, why is the begging testimony not accepted? This has led some jurists and jurists to consider non-begging as an independent condition for justice. (4) - Lack of a rule that includes all cases of "being accused of being a witness". The conditions of "justice" and "not being suspected" have led to the rejection of the beggar's testimony, while begging does not in itself deprive of justice, unless it is accompanied by forbidden acts, such as: lying, cheating, etc. . On the other hand, "being under suspicion" does not lead to the non-acceptance of testimony everywhere.