Feasibility study of preferential electoral system in the Islamic Consultative Assembly elections(Case Study ; Mamasani and Rostam electorate)

In Iran, since the beginning of the constitution, various models such as guild elections, two degrees and the majority system have been implemented; But still, the discussion of choosing a favorable electoral system, appropriate to the geographical, ethnic and cultural conditions and characteristics in the Iranian political system has been one of the most challenging issues in recent years. Among these, two cities of Noorabad Mamasani and Rostam have been the most challenging districts for recent years. It is truly a controversial and disputing issue in rather than ending conflicts. Accordingly, current study has been based on this question: “what kind of electoral system can be impose to this constituency to replace disunion, diversity (disagreement) and deepening social gaps by understanding, empathy and civic participation? So, preferential-alternative voting system has been suggested as a proper model for this constituency and studied as a primary answer.In this system, candidates attempt to poll the absolute majority votes that is necessary for entering parliament so it is needed to seek citizens` vote and focus on benefits and values of several social groups as well as commitment to them instead of emphasizing social gaps. So, social cohesion can be achieved and unity basis can be consolidated by implementing this electoral system in a long term but also prevents the breakdown of social bonds.