Evaluating the solutions Of Quranic Scholars in Coming Out of the Theological Challenges of the Ayah Ehlak (al-Isra/16)

The sixteenth verse of Surah Al-Isra 'which is mentioned is one of the Quranic similarities; It confronts the reader with three verbal challenges. The first challenge is the precedence of the will of destruction by God (desire) before the commit transgression in town (commit transgression)This challenge is interpreted in ancient literature as "precedence of punishment over action" and in modern legal literature as "retribution before crime". The problem is why God willed to destroy them before the town became commit transgression? Another challenge is the divine accrue to commit transgressions and its intellectual ugliness, According to the emergence of the phrase "Fafsqwa". The third challenge is the compulsion and unwillingness of the slave, Because of the inevitable divine will to perish, the evolutionary command to the servants has also been fulfilled, Including that obliged to obedience or transgression What is important is the inviolability of the divine order and destruction formative His servants.This research is organized by descriptive-analytical method; with using the way of commentators was able to combine two phrases "desire" and "commend" With possible literary structures of phrases "when we desire to destroy a town" and "we commend its affluent ones" extract forty-two possibilities. Of these forty-two interpretive possibilities, only fifteen possibilities are free of the three challenges mentioned and can be justified but what can be examined that Retreat from the theological challenges of the verse is not necessarily due to permissible literary considerations, omission or precedence and delay of the condition and punishment.