A Critical Discourse Analysis of Muʻallaqat Based on Van Dyke's Social Cognitive Theory (Case Study: Omar and Harith Suspensions as model)

Critical discourse analysis is a new approach to discourse analysis that has been used in recent decades in a wide range of research in the fields of literature and psychology. It is also considered as one of the new trends in linguistics, which reveals the ideological views of the author by infiltrating the substrates and superstructures of texts at all their micro and macro levels and explains the relationship between language, authority and ideology. Although the critical discourse analysis approach prioritizes the relationship between language, power, ideology and discourse, nations' literature can also be analyzed and interpreted in the context of critical discourse and linguistic criticism. In the same respect, the Seven Pendants are among the works that can be studied in the context of critical discourse analysis. It allows the analyst to uncover the relationship between power, ideology, and discourse in this work. Van Dyck's theory is a sociocognitive model that critically analyzes texts and uses various methods to study text and speech strategies and their relationship to social and political spheres. In the same context, the purpose of this article is a socio-cognitive analysis of the comments of Amr and Al-Harith by relying on Van Dyck's ideological quadrant in discourse analysis that examines the subject of the commentators from the perspective of affirming the ego (the self) and marginalizing the other (the censor) Both poets sought to assert their collective honor and prove their tribal dominance over the censor. The final conclusion shows that highlighting t