Religious Systematizing in the Contemporary World: An Introduction to Explaining the Systematization of Quranic Ethics

There two theories about ethical messages in Quran; Assent theory and Dissent theory to Quranic ethical systematization. The first theory indicates the possibility of being systematized of these concepts and its benefits in outlining ethical guidelines and also considers them as a set of predicates, instructions, topics and concepts which are in an appropriate order, relationship and construction acting in respect of both thematic conceptual relations and rulings associations to reach a specific objective; moreover, this system has a casual progression and plays an important role in reaching that objective. In contrast, the second theory admits it as a useless one, and considers it as a means to limit the ethical values and believes that the richness in ethic is beyond the system. This paper is to prove the first theory in Quran by means of documents and analyzing method; therefore, at first it explains this systematization, then goes on to state the advantages of ethical system discovery against rival theory; in addition, it will talk about its believers and their reason to believe it; and also it gives some evidences to show the possibility of necessary elements discovery to make an ethical system and mentions the explanation about them. Finally, the triple respects will follow up. This theory asks for those Quranic studies that although they include elements, concepts, prospects, rulings, narratives and authentications, it will be shown that all these meanings are omnidirectional and relatable. In this discussion, the focus is on its general form. Eventually the theories problems will be adverted to.