Semiotic Comparison of Rumi's Neynameh and Qaisar Aminpour's Fasl - e- Vasl based on Riffaterre’s View

Today, different theoretical and research domains of literature each try to analyze literary works from a different and, of course, systematic perspective. It can be said that the development of the theoretical framework, methodical analysis, presentation of codified results, and avoidance of taste-based opinions are the basis of many literary types of research of the present day; one of these domains is semiotics. Semiotics is related to many aspects of life, especially literature in the broad sense and poetry in the specific sense, because of its essential function of "examining something that represents something else." The system of semantic connection in literature, or the connection between signifier and signified, or what should be discovered in literary texts on the basis of existing signs, has been a significant vehicle for semioticians to enter literary texts from different angles. In this paper, Moalavi’s Neynameh and Aminpoor's Fasl-e- Vasl, which pay attention to the subject of “union”, according to Riffaterre’s view, were analyzed and compared. The present study, by drawing descriptive systems, hypo gram, and matrix, shows that these two texts, despite their similar content, have expressed two opposite views.The narrator of Neynameh, complaining of parting and getting along, does not seem, Joiner, while the narrator of Fasl-e- Vasl, by motivating others and … has reached its optimum. Although descriptive systems in Fasl-e- Vasl are less, have greater diversity; Hypo grams of this poem is also widespread. In addition, ungrammaticality and neologism in Aminpoor's poem compared with Neynameh are much more impressive.