A comparative inquiry into realism or expediency about the punishment of limits From the perspective of Islamic humanities with emphasis on the teachings of Islamic criminology
The issue of closing or adjusting the limits or its full implementation in the contemporary period, which is the period of the absence of Imam Masoom (AS), is a debate that has been disputed by jurists for years, each of whom has tried to prove his views by referring to narrations and verses.. In this criminal policy, the divine limits can be divided into two parts before proof and after proof. In such a way that the perpetrator can refer to the rightful owner and ask him to waive the punishment and reconcile with him. The result is the identification of the negative effect of criminal judgments issued by foreign courts and a fundamental guarantee for the observance of the rights of the accused and the convicted and an effective tool for moderating the behavior of governments in exercising sovereignty and punishmentnegative effect of criminal judgments issued by foreign courts and a fundamental guarantee for the observance of the rights of the accused and the convicted and an effective tool for moderating the behavior of governments in exercising sovereignty and punishment
- حق عضویت دریافتی صرف حمایت از نشریات عضو و نگهداری، تکمیل و توسعه مگیران میشود.
- پرداخت حق اشتراک و دانلود مقالات اجازه بازنشر آن در سایر رسانههای چاپی و دیجیتال را به کاربر نمیدهد.