The knowledge of reading is one of the sciences required by the interpreter in explaining and understanding the divine meaning. The historical course of the knowledge of readings and the view of commentators on this knowledge indicates the difference between the views of commentators and thinkers on the readings of the Holy Quran. In some periods of history, we see a literary view of readings and in some periods, we encounter a hadith approach to the recitation of the Holy Quran. On the other hand, in addition to the type of views on the knowledge of reading, reading in different interpretations has functions that seem to be considered in contemporary interpretations, especially Shiite interpretations. Shiite commentators, based on the words of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS), have considered the recitation of the Qur'an as one and the difference between the narrators. Therefore, some Shiite commentators try to prefer the famous recitation with different methods and methods. According to this issue, in the present article, Tafsir al-Furqan, which is one of the contemporary interpretations, is analyzed by descriptive-analytical method in order to explain the interpreter's approach to the difference of readings and to analyze the reading preference in this interpretation. The results show that the commentator has a hadithic approach to recitation and prefers only the famous and common recitation of Hafs from Asim and in all cases tries to justify and prefer this recitation and the narrations in this regard are his main document in the discussion. Is readings.