The argument of matter and form on the union of the wise and the rational and the analysis of the doubt of allegory and confiscation

Hakim Sabzevari in the atmosphere of transcendent wisdom and with the transcendent indisputable principles and passing through the framework of appeasement with the principles of previous philosophers, has tried to establish an argument to prove the unity of reason and the wise. Some of the principles and materials of these arguments are apparently, not the content, the same principles and materials of the previous scholars. One of the causes of suspicion for some novices is the neglect of this matter. One of Hakim Sabzevari's arguments on the rational union of the argument of "matter and form" is that in establishing it, on the one hand, he refers to the ontological principles of matter, form and soul, and on the other hand, Sadra's view of psychology underlies the completion of this argument. have given. Hakim Sabzevari has written an article in order to distort all the arguments and accuses Hakim of "gross sputum" in recognizing the basic contents of philosophy. In this regard, in rejecting the argument of matter and form, he has turned to two main accusations. On the one hand, he accused Hakim of using allegorical analogy instead of argumentative analogy, and on the other hand, he condemned the expropriation as desirable. An analysis shows that this argument is based on complete unity, and that the article has been distorted both in the position of the report and in the position of the judge, which has deviated from irrational positions.