Adaptation the Rule of Pride on Waste, Causation and Harmless Rules in Iranian Criminal Law

One of the social goals of human beings is to achieve perfection and comfort and to stay away from pride and unwanted losses. Knowledge of this has entered into various ways in this subject to understand their intentions and keep away from multiple disciplines by gaining information and legal and social understanding. The presenter of these topics must be familiar with the needs of this field, including social sciences, civil law, and criminal jurisprudence, to understand the meaning and purpose of the word Gharar and the Rule of harmlessness and to transmit it to others. How can the experts in this field use the people to express the possible harms, and with what principles can they be taught to understand the superior concept? This paper presents the analytical analysis of the word damage and the difference between the rule of pride and loss from knowledge of literature, jurisprudence, and law. By examining legal sources, this library research method deals with the question of how to avoid harm. Emphasis on the principles and definitions of the legal rules of pride, causation, loss, and harmlessness states that society considers and harms it. There are many aspects between the law of Ghoror and causation. Experience shows that knowledge does not have the full rights of the audience to be in the vortex of ignorance, arrogance, and loss. With the help of a common denominator such as the social sciences, psychology seeks to ensure that the sciences resulting from neglect and harm are growing in societies. In this paper, while using the methods of linguistic analysis, we conclude that the desired result is obtained by posing parallel problems to avoid repetitive processes. This study intends to guide users in courts and arbitrations according to the views of criminal law thinkers and be responsible for providing solutions to criminal disputes.