Conditionalization of the realization of the crime of armed uprising in Article 287 of the Islamic Penal Code in critical scales

The Islamic penalty code of 2012 considered the realization of the title of a Rebel subject to armed uprising and the use of guns. This article tries to cite the definitions and other statements of the jurists on this subject (despite the lack of an independent plan related to the aforementioned conditionality in the works of the jurists and as a result the difficulty of discovering their views), by referring to the Sharia evidence, including the verses of the Holy Quran and The narrations of Ahl al-Bayt (pbuh) should prove the theory of non-stipulation and thus, prove the distortion of the legislator's point of view in this field. The inaccuracy of making the crime dependent on the use of weapons becomes clearer when we consider the advancement of technology and today's facilities, and that it is possible to achieve the same results as weapon as the use of new tools and even with simple actions such as spreading lies in the cyber space. The present research was done using descriptive analytical method and library data.