An attitude towards issuing a criminal verdict based on the knowledge of the judge

Judging is a serious and important matter in the Islamic judicial system, which requires full knowledge and mastery in all aspects of this matter. Judges are successful in their work if the judgments issued by them are based on legal materials and jurisprudence rulings and substantiated by valid Shari'a and legal evidences that lead to knowledge and certainty. The issue of the judge and the resolution of the conflict between the people of the administration of justice and the delivery of the right to the rightful is the basis of proceedings in Islamic courts, therefore, the judge is obliged to fully examine the evidence presented by The litigants are presented to pay in cases where they consider it necessary to study the evidence through investigation and examination of the place, expertise, etc. to do; One of the controversial issues related to the methods of proving a claim and has created questions in the minds of many researchers is the knowledge of a judge, meaning whether the knowledge of a judge is valid and valuable for proving a claim? If so, is it absolutely valid or in some cases? If not valid why? What are the evidences and documents of each? The present article aims to explain this issue and its purpose is to find a suitable answer to the above questions, therefore, to clarify the discussion and the usual procedure in this research, it is necessary to understand the concept of judge and its role in criminal matters and other evidences and the place of judge science in religions. Let's examine Islam and jurisprudence. And in the end, because the position of the judge is the position of credibility and decision-making, and the purpose of providing all the proceedings is to acquire the knowledge of the judge.