Mulla Sadra and Heidegger's reading of the Platonic Truth

Heidegger argues that Aletheia means non-concealment to the Greeks, which is inherent in beings, but Plato, believing in the proverbial world, introduced truth as conformity and transferred it to human reason. For this reason, truth lost its inherent character and became in accordance with cognition of its own, and thus of the conventional dichotomies of philosophy. Although Mulla Sadra has fundamental similarities with Heidegger, he considers truth to have multiple meanings, and in the third stage of his philosophical thought, by attaining sympathy, with his special interpretation of Platonic philosophy, he removes the conventional dualities of philosophy before him. He reaches and reaches unificationism and considers the truth in Plato as a matter of existential levels and accepts it. In this article, with a descriptive-analytical method and with library tools, while looking at the truth in Plato, we will examine the views of Heidegger and Mulla Sadra and finally extract Sadra's critiques of Heidegger's thinking about the truth.