The role of informal actors in responding to unintentional crimes causes diyat

 The broad definition of criminal policy emphasizes the role of public institutions in partnering with formal institutions in combating the criminal phenomenon, and therefore participatory criminal policy means the broad participation of public institutions alongside formal and governmental institutions in response to crime. Diyat in unintentional crimes is more than a criminal form, it is a legal framework for compensating and compensating the victim, therefore, due to the existence of significant capacities such as labor dispute resolution authorities, primary and renewal boards. According to the medical system, the bodily injury insurance fund, dispute resolution councils, mediating authorities, etc., it is possible to handle cases related to blood money in unintentional crimes, such as work-related accidents, sports accidents, medical accidents and accidents. Driving is crystallized with the participation of informal and non-governmental institutions and, according to criminal policy scholars, public institutions and not only by the court as a formal government institution, which in addition to reducing the entry of cases to the judiciary, avoids From labeling, reducing trial delays, de-judicialization, using the capacities of civil institutions in resolving disputes, tending to a restorative approach in dealing with crimes and protecting the rights of both parties to the lawsuit, and dealing appropriately and distinctly with other perpetrators of intentional crimes in court.