Political economy of the boycott and its impact on the adaptive political structure of democratic and non-democratic states

In the words of political economy, economic sanctions are one of the instruments of control of countries that are in the interest of the economic and social interests of the dominant countries. The ban as one of the most important foreign policy instruments of the countries has continued to maintain its high profile in the twenty-first century and has become a powerful lever for countries. In pursuit of maintaining the goals and interests of the self-government of the countries under sanctions, the ban is an important role for the international community due to its low cost as a civilian, and as a substitute for civilian aid, it is useful because the military apparatus is both costly and possible. It has the potential to increase political instability, violence, general discontent, regime change, rebellion, and custody. The effects and consequences of the boycott of the political structures of the sanctions countries are visible. It can be pointed out to political instability, violence, general discontent, regime change, rebellion and custody. It is gradually weakened and stabilized, and ultimately leads to a change in political attitude. It seems that sanctions, despite the undeniable effects that the stabilization of democratic states has made, is unimaginable in the case of non-democratic countries. In this sense, the boycott has failed to undermine the political instability of the political structures of its governments. Because governments An undemocratic process that has led to a change in behavior or a