A Critical Investigation of One Word and Two Combinations in the Third Divan of Hakim Rokna

In this study, regarding the Third Divan of Hakim Rokna (known as Masih Kashani), the meaning of the phrase(به طرح دادن) ‘be tarh dadan’ is investigated. It is one of the controversial combinations, although it has been studied and discussed for centuries, not only has it not reached a conclusion, but everyone has gone wrong in its interpretation. The phrase is dealt with firstly based on a comprehensive study, especially by witnessing the verse of Hakim in one of the sonnets of the Third Divan. The results of this study can be an end to all verbal disputes, meaningless phrases, and incorrect arguments of the authors on the meaning of this combination, since the poet completely clarified the issue by bringing the simile of(به خرمن دادن) ‘be kharman dadan’, which is a sign of abundance, along with the combination of ‘be tarh dadan’. In the examples from other books mentioned in the study, considering the issues before and after it, this point is very clear. However, the verse of Hakim is: ما بلبلیم لیک به گلشن نمی رویم تا گل به ما به طرح و به خرمن نمی دهند /Maa bolbolim lik be golshan nemiravim/ /Taa gol be maa be tarh o be kharman nemidehand/ Translation: We are nightingales, so we don't go to garden; Until they don't give flowers to us, to.…{be tarh o be kharman} And it is clear that the meaning of this combination in Persian poetry and prose does not match the meaning of Golestan commentators and commentators of other books, and by presenting these incorrect interpretations, they only cause readers and researchers to wander. Then, the Turkish word ‘song’ and ‘Kharabeh-Dehe Song’ and other derivatives and their origins are investigated and different aspects of their meanings are depicted. Then, the importance of the combination of ‘sineh kardan’ is mentioned.