Analysis and review of Khosrow and Shirin Nizami, focusing on the debate between Khosrow and Farhad By using the components of Fairclough's critical discourse analysis approach

One of the methods of examining the text is Fairclough's critical discourse analysis approach, in which special attention is paid to its situational and discursive context in the examination of the text, and it is examined at three levels: description, interpretation and explanation. In this article, an attempt was made to analyze the system of Khosrow and Shirin Nizami with the approach of critical discourse analysis, focusing on the debate between Khosrow and Farhad. In examining the text and at the level of description, we are faced with two types of stances in the form of Farhad and Khosrow's debate, which shows the conflict between the lower and upper classes. At the level of interpretation, the social context of the text indicates the praise of the institution of the court, as a result of which the ruling ideology appears on the text. At the level of explanation, the text does not seek to confront the prevailing ideology, but to legitimize it. Finally, the text has reproduced power relations and tried to stabilize and continue them.