Comparative Analysis of ghortobi and Abu Hayan Andolosi Interpretive Style

Qortobi and Abu Hayan Andolosi commentaries are two of the earliest and most popular interpretations of the Islamic world of Sunni religion that have historically been the subject of commentary by Muslim scholars, and in particular Shiite and Sunni commentators. These two interpretations have been of particular interest to commentators for their concessions, as much as the jurisprudential, literary, and lexical views of Qortobi and Abu Hayan Andolosi have been used and analyzed in most of the commentary works of medieval and contemporary times. The need to address these two interpretations and their style of writing and writing is to enhance the interpretive views of the commentators and to analyze them. In this descriptive-analytical study, based on a review of verses 24-24 of Sura Ibrahim, we find that the commonalities of the two interpretations are as follows: Attempting to interpret with effective narrations, Ijtihad with observance of interpretative rules and rules, mentioning different readings. , Mentioning the descent, expressing the occasion of the verses, referring to the lexical and syntactic theorems. Also, regarding the difference betweenthe two interpretations, Qortobi is distinguished by mentioning the Prophetic traditions, the sayings of the Companions and the subjects, and the division of verses into numerous issues andthe pursuitof jurisprudential rulings from Abu hayan. In a sense, Abu Hayan divides the Qur'anicverses into different sections and interprets them. But this is not the case, and the textof the Qur'an is mentioned in verse verse or two verses and does not divide them into different sections.