Jurisprudential study of violations of the ban on attacks on civilians by the Ba'athist regime in Iraq in the imposed war

During Saddam's eight-year war, Saddam's Ba'athist regime repeatedly directly or indirectly attacked, wounded, and killed civilians, including children, women, the elderly, and other non-war human rights groups. It is important to compare these measures with the rules of jurisprudence Saddam and the Ba'athist regime to gain the support of other Islamic and Arab countries in the war against Iran and confront the United States and Israel He pretended to adhere to the rules of Islam The purpose of this article is to show the extent to which Saddam's Ba'athist regime adheres to the jurisprudential rules of war. The research method will be such as examining the Qur'anic and narrative evidences and documents Gains theoretical foundations for the prohibition of attacks on civilians and the rules governing the treatment of civilians in war And then she will provide examples of violations of these rules by the Ba'athist regime in the imposed war Theoretical foundations of the prohibition of assault on civilians in this article based on common evidence and documentsAmong the religions of Islam And is examined without entering into the individualities and differences of religions To be usable from the perspective of jurisprudence of all Islamic religions The result of this article will show Not only does the Ba'athist regime not adhere to Islamic rules banning the fight against civilians, But in many cases with the aim of emptying Iran of the Iranian race and replacing the Iraqi race Deliberately trying to kill more civilians in the imposed war