Reconciliation of suicide with amputation

According to the opinions of the jurists, and based on the principles of the Shiites, the first principle in premeditated killing is retribution. But Islamic law gave this right to the guardians of the murdered, so that they could fully forgive their right or forgive and make their pardon depend on money. However, sometimes there are cases in which it is not possible to carry out "qisas al-nafs" for certain reasons, and the guardians refuse to give up financial matters or pardon.In this case, is it for the guardians of the murdered to ask for a compromise by cutting off the limb instead of self-retaliation? This reconciliation, on the one hand, will heal the pain of the victim's loss of guardians, and on the other hand, it will save the soul of the perpetrator. This new issue clashed with supporters and opponents, and accordingly two opinions were raised, and after explaining and criticizing them, the final opinion was based on the permissibility of replacing self-punishment for amputation with the content analysis method. On the evidence, including the legality of reconciliation, the preponderance of pardon over retaliation, the evidence of the necessity of self-preservation, etc., is a solution to overcome the problems arising from the promise of impermissibility.