Criticism and evaluation Bilingual Dictionaries in the Fields of Defense, Security, Military and Law enforcement

Among the cultural endeavors of Armed Forces researchers, we can mention the development of cultures in the field of defense, security, military and law enforcement. While appreciating all the authors of these works and their efforts, each of whom has dealt with this issue from a different point of view, there is a big flaw in these works, and that is that the compilation of these cultures does not conform to some cultural criteria. Is writing. In this article, we try to show the disadvantages and advantages of cultures written in the Armed Forces by criticizing the bilingual cultures written in the Armed Forces based on general and specific criteria of lexicography so that future researchers can use it and culture. Write scientific articles in accordance with the principles and criteria of modern lexicography. Criticism and evaluation of these cultures show that the authors of military cultures in some cases such as: scope, inclusion, level, paper quality, type of letters and printing, use of official language, lack of spelling errors, etc. acted well and according to lexicographic criteria. They have advanced, but sometimes they have ignored criteria such as: introduction and preface, images, editing principles, page layout, list of entries, etc., which are necessary for lexicography and need to be corrected in later editions of their works.