A study of call to prayer quality and the triple witness by virtue of Hadiths

A lot of itmes of call prayer (Adhan) and the recitation before prayer (Iqamah) are similar to each other in the Shiite and Sunni religion. There is just a few differences in that. So, we are seeking to resolve them in this research. Tradition extracted in Sunni Islamic jurisprudents’ books are implying both on divine revelation of call to prayer and nondivinerevelation of it. But, the dissection of call to prayer are expressed completely divine revelation in the Shiite resources. All of the Shiite Islamic jurisprudents in obedience to Ahlul- Bayt (AS) believe that call to prayer has been begun with God’s dissection and the divine revelation’s descent on the prophet Mohammad (SA). In the Shiite (twelvers) religion has been represented two approaches about “I bear witness that Ali (AS) isthe Friend of Allah”, as follows; someone considers it as a recommended part. For instance, supplication during prayer in a specific manner (qanut) which is as a part of prayer and is desirable too. Also, the other one considers it recommended without being as a part call to prayer. Both of tradition indicate that bearing witness to the uniqueness of God, His prophet mission, and Ali (AS) Islamic jurisprudential guardianship don’t separate with each other and there is a bound between them. The reason that Shiite Islamic jurisprudents do permissible the triple witness without being as apart is, according to some traditions independently, when you bear witness to Ali (AS) Islamic jurisprudential guardianship. Since these traditions are independent not dependent, also, they will include call to prayer, whether in call to prayer and in the recitationbefore prayer or in none of them.