نشریه پاسخ
پیاپی 24 (زمستان 1400)

With the victory of the Islamic Revolution of Iran and the collapse of the monarchy, the Iranian nation began a new era in the political history of the country, the most important component of which is the end of the millennial imperial system. The Islamic Revolution is not only a sign of the fall of a regime and a government but also a sign of the collapse of the beliefs that have been entrenched in the political culture of our country for years and were considered as a sacred idea for some. The present study has investigated this issue through the descriptive-analytical method and library study. The Islamic Revolution of Iran showed that the culture of the monarchy and its imagery also followed the king, a goner. As God says: "Truly falsehood is a goner"; The Islamic Revolution was in fact a fundamentalist revolution that fundamentally changed all these false ideas

The issue of exporting the Islamic Revolution has been one of the most controversial issues in the history of the Islamic Revolution of Iran. Some intellectuals, such as Mehdi Bazargan, have viewed it critically. The present study uses a descriptive-analytical method to examine his critical view of the policy of exporting the revolution and its evaluation. The research findings show that Bazargan had two views on this issue; in his initial stance he agreed with this issue and in his later views he is considered as one of the serious critics of this idea. He points to issues such as the imposition of the issuance of the revolution, the flight of nations from the revolution, the isolation of the Islamic Revolution, the departure of Muslims to the ranks of infidels, etc. as factors in his claim to oppose this issue. In response to this view, we can also point to issues such as the naturalness of the export of the revolution, the attraction of many nations to the Islamic Revolution, the lack of isolation of the Islamic Revolution due to the awakening of nations, and the conversion of young people to religion and etc.

Anti-arrogance and confrontation with the domination system (antiimperialism) have been one of the principles of the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The emergence of some economic problems has caused some people to associate it with the foreign policy views and while considering the difficult situation of the country, citing the “negation of hardship and embarrassment” rule, may doubt the continuation of resistance. In the present study, in evaluating this idea based on analytical-comparative method, by explaining the natural, intellectual and religious principles of the necessity of resistance and examining the roots of the hegemony system with the Islamic Republic and the costs of compromise, it becomes clear that arrogance (imperialism) is enmity with the Islamic Republic of Iran. It is not superficial and temporary; rather, it is rooted in their hegemonic nature and the Islamic and anti-hegemonic identity of our country. Similarly, the enemies of the Islamic system will not be satisfied with anything but seizing Islamic principles, independence, dignity, and national interests. The taqiyyah and the “negation of hardship and embarrassment” rules which have been forged in order to preserve the religion, do not mean abandoning the foundation of religion. Besides, the country's problems are due to poor management, performance, and lack of attention to the resistance economy, and do not stem from resistance and anti-arrogant positions.

Since the formation of the Islamic Revolution of Iran in 1979, due to its anti-arrogance nature, this phenomenon has been considered an uprising against the world domination system. After the fall of the Pahlavi regime (which was completely dependent on the United States), the Islamic Revolution of Iran continued its orientation towards the domination system. Despite the legitimacy of these positions, some argue that this approach not only did us no good after the victory of the revolution; rather, the damage has been greater. This article, with a descriptiveanalytical method, seeks to assess some of the effects and consequences of the anti-arrogance positions of the Islamic Revolution of Iran, such as maintaining peace and security, defeating the enemy, reducing costs, maintaining the dignity and authority of the Iranian nation, etc.

The existence of government is one of the most essential needs of societies and the core of political life. The importance of having a government in political science is so great that some consider it to be its main subject. For all the importance and function that government has in political science and society, unfortunately, due to the weakness in conceptualization and theorizing, there is no clear view of the issue of government and there is a gap in this regard. Therefore, explaining the views and thoughts of Islamic thinkers about the government can reduce the existing gap. In the present study, with a descriptive-analytical method and a library study, the government has been studied from the perspective of the Supreme Leader and they have been organized in a conceptual model. Their views seem to have the necessary coordination and structure. He considers the ideal state and the level of the Islamic Revolution as an "Islamic state" that has the principles, resources, form, agents, institutions, tasks, and goals.