نشریه بحران پژوهی جهان اسلام
سال ششم شماره 4 (پیاپی 16، زمستان 1398)

The purpose of the present study is to study ethnic cohesion in Sistan and Baluchistan province and its relationship with political participation in the 2021 Iranian presidential elections. The research method was descriptive-analytical, and the results showed that although there is a good relationship between the province's youth cohesion and political participation in the 2021 presidential elections, this relationship is moderate and other interventional variables have an effective relationship with this partnership. Due to the positive relationship between the two variables and the increase in ethnic cohesion in the province, the level of political participation can be increased to some extent. In other words, strengthening the sense of belonging to the ethnicity, facilitating and strengthening interpersonal communication in society, increasing family solidarity, and strengthening their supervision over children can partially increase the level of political participation (A willingness to political participation, support for political activities and carry out political activities) in the presidential election in Iran.

The purpose of the present study is to review political parties from the view of Weber. The method of study is descriptive-analytic and the results showed that from the perspective of Weber, political party is the result of impersonalizing affairs in the realm of competition to gain power, which requires the social action model of purpose rationality and, with respect to previous explanations, the social action model of value rationality among party activists. Other models of traditional and affective social action can not substantiate political parties and their related activities. In other words, in order to form proper political parties, purpose rationality action should replace traditional action and value rationality action should replace affective action. As long as the action model among party activists is traditional and affective, this phenomenon faces some challenges.

The purpose of the present study is to review the attributes of good governance in the System of Ommat (Community) and Imāmat (Leadership) from the view of Shahid Beheshti. The method of study is descriptive-analytic and the results indicate that good political system in Beheshti's view is based on the theory of Ommat-Imāmat so that there is a mutual relation between people and Imām and it is defined with the originality of the citizens' initial will. These two concepts have a bilateral relation and continue a developmental coexistence and finally, the model of good governance is created. In fact, the theory of Ommat-Imāmat is the basic foundation for the analysis of Dr. Beheshti's governance components which is regarded favorable due to admission of humans' innate rights such equality, freedom, and the rule of law as the most important attributes of governance. Therefore, it is so important and necessary to shed light on this model in the idea of Āyatollāh Beheshti: Firstly, it has a direct effect on the legitimacy and efficiency of the Islamic government and secondly, it is a favorable and effective method to expand and advertise the government model of the Islamic Republic because in the present time, models free of these attributes do not have much influence on the publicity of Islam.

The interim government's foreign policy was the development of ideas about the identity of the elite liberal Islamists particular reading this whole idea of the basic concepts like policy "religion and politics", "Islam and the West", Iran and Islam "and contrast the differences and reading with the dominant discourse leads to their separation from mainstream Islamic Republic.Bazagan emphasis on the of the end and the beginning of political behavior of revulution and Beginning political behavior basing on the principles of republicanism and pluralism in the political sphere - social post-revolutionary Iran Bazagan foreign policy in the context of foreign policy, international unit (the state) can be studied. In other words, foreign policy is considered the beginning of the revolution in two ways. Foreign policy framework and the government's foreign policy based on Islamic internationalism, that foreign policy is a Bazagan in the first category. The effect of these statements on the development of foreign policy is considered era Bazrgan.

In this study, the concept of constructive and effective interaction with the world in general and its relationship moderation in foreign policy discourse Hassan Rouhani to be specifically examined. Because of the prominence and the rule of moderation in foreign policy discourse XI, James Rosenau continuity theory appears to be that because of the importance of international environmental and individual factors (ideas and personality Hassan Rohani ) is attached, As this is more relevant research. Accordingly, we have tried to use the analytical method and the use of library and store documents in the discourse of moderation and spiritual faith because of its domination of the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran is considered. The authors believe that conditions such as severe sanctions adopted by the UN Security Council, Iran's security in international relations, reducing relations with neighboring countries, focusing on East and several countries in Latin American politics and Iran during Ahmadinejad and the ideas, slogans and special characters Hassan Rohani, Iran's foreign policy led to the dominant discourse moderation. In fact, foreign policy moderate to display a favorable image of the country internationally, so that would facilitate and provide the national interest.

Yemen is considered to be one of the most fertile parts of the Arabian Peninsula, due to its geographic location and important ports and islands throughout the history of the region, and has filled out regional and international actors, and filled its history pages with various events. Saudi diplomacy and foreign policy are heavily influenced by the ideology of Wahhabism and oil and are therefore heavily concerned about Iran's growing influence in the region. On this basis, Saudi Arabia will try to eliminate Iran from the new equations formed in the region in any way possible and minimize its role. Yemen is one of the most important of these areas. Saudi Arabia considers it as its backyard. Saudi Arabia has considered the repression of Ansarullah and Shiite groups in Yemen as a direct threat from the Islamic Republic of Iran and has addressed military confrontation. The main question of the current research is that Saudi Arabia is following the approach taken by Yemen's popular transformation? The findings suggest that the Saudis, with goals such as limiting Iran, loosening the axis of resistance in the region, and preventing the overflow of Yemen's transformation into its eastern borders, in order to keep Yemeni weak and to keep it out Shiites of the country are taking power from sources. The methodology of this research is descriptive-analytic and it has been tried to investigate this issue based on the theory of aggressive realism.