مقالات رزومه رضا انصاری بارده

Development in contemporary Iran has always been the focus of governments, decision-making bodies, scientific-research centers, as well as intellectuals and public opinion. In recent years, the Iranian Islamic model of progress has been implemented as an alternative to the development model in Iran, but beyond the half-finished document presented by the relevant center, by the operational center that is being implemented or implemented. The authors of this research believe that the model of governance in Iran needs to present a more objective view of the country's historical situation in order to be able to guarantee the country's progress. Dealing with this issue is because until the development model is designed based on the criteria and priorities of the country at the legal levels, documents alone will not help the country's progress. In this way, the main research question is: What are the components and stages of the governance model in the Islamic Republic of Iran for progress? The data collection method here is document-library and its processing method is thematic analysis. Arriving at the main answer started from explaining the necessity of the local development model based on the reading of Ayatollah Khamenei's views, and finally reached the proposition that the governance model in Iran is based on three fundamental steps in the common, distinct and specific needs of the society. To be designed based on the core values ​​of efficiency. Each of these steps also includes a part of the country's path to reach the Islamic state

Security is considered as a crucial need for every individual and also every country in the world. Security has two main aspects. Regional security and international security. Historically, governments, as the most important political units, found out that many issues arise not at the global level but at the regional level, and consequently need to adopt regional strategies to solve problems and succeed in their international politics. The problems in the West Asian region, on the one hand, and the Persian Gulf subdivisions, on the other, prepare a good arena for the presence of various convergence and divergence contexts that must be properly analyzed, and with a proper understanding of the region and its conditions, seek to find all possible capacities to create convergence and to minimize the divergence among nations and governments. In addition to internal factors, national security is also affected by external factors, so the Islamic Republic of Iran needs a stable and secure region to achieve its territorial stability, and therefore it is necessary to consider all possible ways to achieve a stable region. Because negligence of this issue can turn the existing areas and talents of convergence into divergent factors and greatly increase the cost of providing security for the country. Regionalism has an effective role in the development of security indicators and the use of this capacity in its various dimensions can provide national security at higher levels and thus improve the country's position in other areas such as culture, economy and other political fields. This paper seeks to answer the question of how the Islamic Republic of Iran can use the capacity of regionalism to ensure its national security in a sanction condition. This article intends to study the role of regionalism in ensuring the security of the Islamic Republic, using a descriptive-analytical method based on Barry Buzan’s Regional Security theory.

The concept of national interests is one of the key concepts in designing the foreign policy of countries. In the constructivist perspective, national interests are influenced by norms, ideals, and national identity and, unlike the traditional realist approach, do not break with the value system of political actors. This study examines the relationship between national identity and national interests in Ayatollah Khamenei's intellectual system in the framework of constructivism and considering the position of leadership in the macro policy of the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The method of this research is to analyze the content of Ayatollah Khamenei's statements regarding the relationship between national identity and national interests. Ayatollah Khamenei considers the identity of the Iranian nation to consist of Islamic identity, revolutionary identity and Iranian identity. In this study, based on the comparison of the aforementioned identities, the three identities were examined in three dimensions: cultural interests, political interests and economic interests, and it was concluded that the national interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran derive from the national identity of the Iranian nation. And in all three levels, it has a real relationship with three levels of interests, and in Ayatollah Khamenei's intellectual system, national interests come from the Iranian, Islamic and revolutionary layers. In Ayatollah Khamenei's view, the three national identities provide cultural independence, increased political deterrence, security, and increased national wealth.

The US-China confrontation has become more visible in recent years. So that the two countries face each other in different regions of the world and in different areas of politics, geopolitics, economy and security. One area of ​​confrontation between the United States and China is the China Belt and Road Initiative, the implementation of which will make China a superior power on land. In this study, we seek to examine Iran's role in confronting the United States and China. The importance of addressing this issue is that Iran is part of the Belt and Road Initiative, and the relationship between the two sides, the United States and China, with Iran is unique in that the United States confronts Iran and China interacts with Iran. The main question of the research is what is the role of Iran in the confrontation between the United States and China under the belt and way initiative? The process of obtaining the answer to the main question has been through expressing the confrontation between the United States and China and then examining whether or not Iran accompanies the parties to the conflict. The result of this study is to explain the role and influence of Iran in the confrontation between the United States and China in the Belt and Road Initiative, and the conclusion that the presence or absence of Iran in this plan will affect the confrontation between the United States and China.

The non-aligned strategy has been accepted as the main direction of Iran's foreign policy, while the performance of Iran's foreign policy is not necessarily consistent with the non-aligned strategy. Iran's foreign policy strategy can be called active resistance. Active resistance is a new approachof the non-alignment orientation based on the denial of domination and  it’s acceptance. The importance of this discussion is in providing a scientific explanation of the strategy of active resistance, because this strategy provides a more accurate explanation of the performance of Iran's foreign policy and makes decisions closer to reality. The main question of this research is what is the main strategy of Iran's foreign policy? The research hypothesis is that the main strategy of Iran's foreign policy is the strategy of active resistance, not the orientation of non-alignment. Research Method In this article, the descriptive-analytical method using documentary-library data and non-structured elite interviews.. The result of the research is to reach the idea that the main direction of Iran's foreign policy is active resistance. Active resistance is the main factor in directing Iran's foreign policy due to its conformity with the principles of the Islamic Revolution and its conformity with the environment of the West Asian region.