Scientific position of women in Muslim's historiography

The historical literature of us demonstrates not only the absence of association innarrative setting but also incapacity of their historical role. As a result of that, men havebeen recorded their history. In other hand,women historiography is regarded to be malehistory. It has been seemed that the most important reason of this ignorance is the lack of participation of Muslim's women in social role notably in science fields. The reasonswhich made their social scientific role less important are variant. It has been believed thatmaternity substantially in essence of physiology and psychology structure of women.Subsequently, they miss the opportunity to rival with men in scientificand social fieldsdue to this aspect. On the other side, it could not be denied the effect of other factors such as underestimation of women, pioneering of men in fields of conquest of lands andsubsequently discovery and transferring the scientific achievements of other nations andalso translating and completing of them, Islamic rationality outdoor retreat and layerdeposition realistic ideas from Hadith's approach, the dominance of patriarchal thinkingin the arena of family and society and followed by rise of political despotism instead ofpontificated system based on divine legitimation and popularity, substitution of conflictsand sectarian and ethnic wars instead of Islamic tolerance, effectiveness of traditions andthoughts of Arab conflict ignorant life, Buddism, Jewish and Manichaen and finally,changing attitude of religious scholars and Islamic societies into Muslim's position. All ofthese have been influence on weakness of the role of social and scientific of women.The approach of this essay is a combination based on mentioned reasons and otherearthly ones.