Pathology of Structure of Decision Making System in Urban Management Process: Case Study Tehran

 Today, urban management has been transformed, and cities are being managed for the sake of greater prosperity for citizens. Therefore, localism in the province of Tehran as a strategy with the aim of delegating power and resources to local managers and far from central control can create democratic communities and communities in order to achieve a minimum level within the agreed framework between the central government and the local government. Comes from national standards and political priorities. City councils have played an important role as an element of urban management in urban governance at the local level. The purpose of this study was to determine the pathology of the structure of the decision making system in urban Tehran process through descriptive-analytical method and using documentary-referential resources. The statistical population of the study consisted of experts and experts in the field of study. Is. In order to investigate the most effective damage existing in the structure of the council decision making system in urban management process, the Dimetal technique has been used. Damage such as lack of legal and executive capacities to realize integrated management and disproportionate between powers and duties of councils are among the major threats to the structure of the decision making system in the urban management process in Tehran. Chi-Square and Cramer tests were used to evaluate the research hypotheses.