The Role of the Harmless Rule in Proving the Loss in the Transaction and Its Effect on Improving Civil Rights from the Perspective of Islamic Jurisprudence

Islamic jurisprudence and law have various dimensions and components, and in this regard, the rule of no harm and the authority of deception in the field of social and economic relations and, in particular, the lives of citizens are of particular importance. In this regard, the present study seeks to investigate the role of the harmless rule in proving the authority of fraud and its impact on the issue of civil rights. Accordingly, the question arises as to how the no-harm rule can justify fraudulent authority and pave the way for the improvement of civil rights. The hypothesis of the article is: The harmless rule can significantly improve the citizenship rights by denying any harm in Islam and the free will by deceiving the role of the will and free will in transactions. The most important conclusion of the present study is that Imami jurists use the harmless rule as a basis for proving the authority of the deceiver. Also, the harmless rule, considering the prevention of any harm and loss and realization of citizenschr('39') rights, considers gross deception and deceitful ignorance as an obvious harm to the lives of citizens. Citizenschr('39') rights. The present study uses a descriptive-analytical method that collects information using library and documentary methods. Specifically, the study of the views of jurists and jurists is of interest in the present article.