Review and critic of Christianity and Democracy

This paper in the first in short look into form of  Stern's bookand then it criticizes the content of this book,especially threeimportant parts of it, which are the most difficult and at the same time The most important its parts, compared with Hegel's phenomenology but All his system. These are preface, introduction and the final chapter.We want to know how much Stern has been successful In consideration of the content of these three sections. Also does the seventh chapter of his book have internal coordination with content of them?