Analysis Of Effective Drivers In Pattern Framework Of Spatial-Policy Making

Architectural rupture and instability is a pattern of land management with disabilities and theoretical and operational shortcomings that the foundation of this kind of integrated and coordinating approach is always shaken with intensity and weakness. Considering the applicability of the objectives of the present paper, the analysis of effective inadequacies, clustering and analysis of the effects of each factor in the architecture of the planning model and land management policy of the present study is present. With this description, the strategic question is what are the shortcomings (factors) affecting the architecture of the land use planning and policy model? To answer the question, analytical methodology based on Delphi tools and interpretive-structural modeling has been used. The data collection tool and method is based on library method (research background analysis) and researcher-made questionnaire (cross-factor analysis of factors). For this purpose, based on the opinions of thematic experts (15 land management experts), it has been scored and analyzed using Mick Mac software. The results of the research have shown that among the components of "model architecture", "architectural implementation", "monitoring and evaluation" of planning and policy-making, "model architecture" as an intellectual and philosophical foundation with 74.1%, It has the most inadequacies. In addition, among the architectural components of the model, the "principles" dimension has the most inadequacies. Clustering, Analysis, and Distribution of Propellants reflects the fact that most key propulsions related to the components of "principles" and "framework" in terms of pattern architecture with 37% and 36%, respectively, and in the next categories of "pattern management" In terms of "architectural performance" with 27% has the most key highlights.