Critical analysis of the Security Council's performance and practice in ensuring compliance with non-proliferation commitments

The identification of a new approach to international legal regime-building through the transition from traditional practices to emerging processes such as the exercise of general legislative powers by the UN Security Council has added to the complexity of the entanglement. Measures taken to increase the level and depth of regulatory mechanisms for non-proliferation systems in the form of resolutions such as UN Security Council Resolution 1540 or the establishment of nuclear fuel banks based on the resolutions of the International Atomic Energy Agency's plenary sessions change this international legal approach. Has highlighted the field. It is clear that the new process, which is considered the beginning of a new and different life in the field of nuclear security, like the discriminatory legal practice of the past, seeks to restrict and restrict the rights of those without access to nuclear technology to cover international security. Does not suggest action in eliminating nuclear weapons. The chanting of the slogan of non-fulfillment of the goals of the non-proliferation system by some countries in the international arena is a step to justify the current emerging trends and that is why identifying mechanisms for implementing such ideas in modern international law is an undeniable necessity. In this study, an attempt has been made to examine the process correctly and realistically from the documents and sources of international law and to take steps to increase the richness and capacities of the international law literature in this field.Keywords: Nuclear weapons, Security Council, NPT, Nuclear proliferation