Analysis of the legislative and supervisory performance of different periods of the Islamic Parliament using two-stage data envelopment analysis

Recognizing the significance of decisions and decision-making by the Islamic Parliament and their impact on human societies, it is crucial to evaluate the efficiency of different parliamentary terms, identify strengths and weaknesses, and determine influential factors for enhancing future performance. The reformation of the decision-making process is essential as it will result in sound decisions and elevate the political and economic conditions of the country. Thus, the objective of this research is to propose a two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) model to evaluate the performance of various periods of the Islamic Parliament (from the third to the tenth period) in terms of legislation and supervision. In the proposed approach, each term of the Islamic Parliament is considered a two-stage decision-making unit (DMU), with legislation as the first stage and supervision as the second stage. The results suggest that, generally, 50% of the periods are efficient, while the remaining 50% are inefficient. Specifically, Periods C, D, G, and H are identified as efficient periods across both dimensions. However, Period B, in terms of overall performance and the supervision dimension, and Period A, within the legislative dimension, are pinpointed as the most inefficient periods. Additionally, an analysis of the average efficiency scores in legislation and supervision underscores that, overall, the Islamic Parliament has demonstrated superior performance in legislation compared to supervision during various periods. This disparity in performance between the supervisory and legislative aspects has led to higher inefficiencies among the periods characterized as inefficient.