ali ansari

Paragraf 1 of Article 8 of the UNCITRAL Model Law and Paragraf 3 of Article 2 of the New York Convention express the duty of the court in referring the matter to arbitration. The mentioned articles oblige the court to refer the matter to arbitration if requested by one of the litigants, unless it finds that the arbitration agreement is not valid. Researches show that the consideration of judges in this assumption can be done in two ways: A) Breif Review, B) Substantive Review. The important difference between these two methods is that the announcement of the court's result in the brief review is not considered a verdict according to most legal systems; But when the court conducts a substantive review in relation to the arbitration agreement, it will lead to the issuance of a decision. Proponents of the brief review theory believe that respecting the principle of jurisdiction over jurisdiction requires that judges be the first judges of their jurisdiction, but the authors in this research have argued that in the draft paragraph 1 of Article 8 of the UNCITRAL Model Law, it is proposed to insert a phrase that defines the concept of brief review It evokes that it was given, but it was not accepted by the members of the UNCITRAL working group, as well as the absolute acceptance of the negative effect of the principle of jurisdiction over jurisdiction, contrary to the decreasing trend of courts' involvement in arbitration and the establishment and development of the arbitration institution as an independent authority will lead to theoretical conflicts and have the opposite result. The judicial opinions in this field are completely mixed, but it seems that the approach of the opinions that accepted the middle opinion by accepting the elements of both theories is more correct.

Validation has always been a significant part of assessment in educational settings. However, due to its complexities, most officials prefer to use ready-made tests to avoid validating their own tests. This study validates a screening writing test in an EFL context using an evidence-based validation approach. This study reflects the researcher’s attempts to collect evidence to justify the newly developed test use and interpretation. The participants of this study were 53 Iranian B1 English language learners. To collect the required evidence, the researcher employed a questionnaire to investigate the learners’ cognitive processes that they went through to write the texts. Furthermore, the scores were correlated with the participants’ scores on a First Certificate in English (FCE) writing task to attain the criterion-related validity evidence. Evidence related to scoring validity and consequential validity was also collected by employing simple statistical measures, such as correlation, t-test, and percentage, that are easy for teachers to run. The findings of the study showed the (cognitive, context, scoring, consequential, and criterion-related) validity of the developed test. The pieces of evidence collected in this study supported the validity of the test for the intended use. The present report can enlighten novice teachers as to how to collect a body of evidence to ensure different stakeholders about the validity of their tests. While validation might be perceived as a complicated process, which is not within teachers’ ability, this study can provide a blueprint to guide teachers on how to show their accountability through easy-to-implement steps.

Effective educational strategies are crucial for developing moral sensitivity in nursing students. Traditional lecture-based methods may lack engagement, prompting the exploration of game-based approaches. This study compares the impacts of game-based and lecture-based teaching on nursing students' moral sensitivity.In this quasi-experimental study, 46 fourth-semester nursing students from Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences participated. The control group received traditional lectures, while the intervention group engaged in game-based learning focused on moral scenarios in eight 90-minute sessions.Of the initial 46 students, 42 completed the study. Both groups had similar demographics. Post-intervention, the game-based group showed a statistically significant increase in total moral sensitivity scores (P = 0.017). Additionally, they scored higher in “experience of ethical problems and conflicts” (P = 0.044) and in “sincerity and benevolence” (P = 0.007) compared to the lecture group. It was concluded that game-based teaching methods significantly enhance moral sensitivity among nursing students compared to traditional lectures, particularly in areas related to ethical conflicts and benevolence. Future research should focus on the long-term effects and integration of game-based learning in nursing education.

Approaching posterior fossa pathologies is fairly challenging. Poor exposure, Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) leak following surgery, post-operative suboccipital and neck pain, and wound healing are common challenges following traditional suboccipital midline incision. Herein, we present a new incision for approaching posterior fossa pathologies. The incision is shaped like a question mark and makes a musculofascial flap supplied by occipital artery on top of providing a wide area for craniotomy. In our technique, the dura is also incised in a question mark shaped manner. Three patients with masses in posterior fossa were operated with the new incision. Following surgeries, there were no adverse events including CSF leak, wound complications, severe suboccipital pain and neck instability in any of the patients. This new incision not only facilitates approaching to pathologies in posterior fossa with providing wider exposure, but also enables us for watertight Dural closure which decreases CSF leak. Also, as the muscular incision provides a sufficient area for craniotomy, muscular retraction can be minimized to avoid post-operative pain. Moreover, as opposed to the midline avascular incision, the flap is well supplied by occipital artery which facilitates the healing procedure.

Handicrafts are artistic products that are made by hand or simple tools for decorative purposes or use in everyday life. Handicrafts can be considered as applied arts. On the one hand, they have creative artistic elements, and on the other hand, they are produced as a single product or a mass product for individual or social use. Handicrafts of Iran are an important part of the culture of our land and its products account for a significant share of the local economy in the traditional markets of Iran. The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the factors affecting the presence of Iranian handicrafts in the world exhibition. This research is a qualitative-statistical research of the type of applied studies. In this research, the desired information has been collected in the field, by survey method and also by conducting interviews with experienced participants in these exhibitions, and it has been analyzed by logical reasoning method and using spss software. The obtained results have indicated that by encouraging, helping and guiding artisans as well as raising the level of their specialized and professional information and considering the existing different cultural fields, by creating recognition in the world trade arena, it is possible to gain a prestigious position in International level achieved. Also, preserving and strengthening handicrafts and its manifestation as one of the main pillars of the cultural life of our country and creating solidarity among handicraftsmen in the whole country can be offered in today's and modern areas and can be a way forward for handicrafts producers.

The goal of capital market dispute resolution system is legal claims resolution with a focus on securing private interests, like civil litigation. The difference is that there are public and economic interests of the country in addition to private interests in the capital market.Ensuring a fair and efficient dispute resolution system is one of the factors for capital market prosperity by reducing investment risk and encouraging more investment. The efficiency of dispute resolution system is rooted in its desirability for investors. Fairness, speed, and expertise in dispute resolution system are the most important criteria for the desirability of dispute resolution system from the perspective of investors.Alignment with the special interests and necessities of capital market dispute resolution system (speed and expertise) will be achieved by deviating from some principles of dispute resolution system, while the invariable and definite principles of dispute resolution must be completely applied. The present research seeks to identify and evaluate the mentioned principles by the descriptive-analytical method.

Urban gardens and forest parks have a lot of ecosystem services, recreation, and tourism for cities, and valuing these services is very necessary because it can show the importance of their protection. In this regard, the aim of this study is to estimate the conservation, heritage, and tourism value of Artesh 06 Garden (former Saltanat Abad Garden) in the east of Tehran. Due to the limitation of visits and the limitation of data, among the valuation methods, the benefit transfer method and alternative cost method were used, and the required data were extracted from previous studies and experiences according to the meta-analysis method. The results show that the value of preservation of heritage services per visitor per year is about 110 thousand Tomans and the value of conservation-tourism services per visitor per year is about 62 thousand Tomans and the total value of the heritage and conservation services and tourism of Artesh 06 Garden is estimated to be about 172 thousand tomans per visitor per year. Therefore, maintaining the 06 Garden in the form of a regeneration scenario can have benefits and annual economic value between 1021 and 1892 billion Tomans for the people of Tehran and Iran.

In this article, we have tried to investigate the causes that prevent civil liability in spite of the occurrence of harmful acts.

Method of research: 

This paper is descriptive-analytic, and the required information is collected by library method.

Findings of the research:

 Familiarity with the work related to the factors responsible for eliminating responsibility and impeding the establishment of civil liability, identifying their disparate aspects, such as urgency and mistake, nature, including the findings of the research.

Police Officers may cause damage in their actions and missions. In this case, according to the general rule, his exemptions from civil liability should be taken into consideration; in other cases, in spite of the occurrence of damage, the police may invoke "justified causes" and "lien" for reasons of liability, and can prove to be exempted from damages. Some of the writers of such a word have been named as verbal or legitimate verbs that cause another harm, as the nature of the work done or because of the law can not be regarded as an illegitimate act.

The issue of agriculture in Iran, especially in recent years, has been linked to the national security of the Islamic Republic of Iran under the influence of issues such as international sanctions, successive droughts, transgenics, mismanagement and the like.This study examines national security based on the theories of the Copenhagen School and the theory of resistance economics. The research method is a cross-sectional survey method with two purposes of description and explanation. The study population is the managers and experts of knowledge-based and technology companies in the field. The sample size was selected according to Cochran's formula of 384 people. The measurement tools in this research included a researcher-made questionnaire to measure the formation of research variables.The results of the hypotheses showed that eliminating the security consequences of the water crisis in Iran by relying on the expansion of technological and knowledge-based activities will improve the security of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Also, self-sufficiency in agriculture and increasing the coefficient of food security by relying on the expansion of technological and knowledge-based activities will improve the security of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Self-medication with antibiotic is a widelyprevalent practice all over the world especially among medical students. This study was aimed to evaluate the prevalence and the pattern of self-medication among medical students in Tehran, Iran.Materialsand

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among the undergraduate medical students from a referral university in Tehran, Iran. All data obtained were analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences program (SPSS) version 20.

A total of 201 students were enrolled in the current study. According to the analysis, 129 (64.1%) of the study population reported that they have self-medicated with antibiotics at least once in their student life. The principal morbidities for seeking self-medication include cough and common cold (23.4%) followed by fever (14.9%). The most frequent antibiotics used to self-medicate the mentioned morbidities were: amoxicillin (62%), co-amoxiclav (19.4%), penicillin (17%), cefixime (16%), azithromycin (14%) and tetracycline (9%). The majority of the participants stated cost saving, convenience and lack of confidence as their reasons for self-medication. The drug selection was mostly based on opinion of family members (31.8%), their own experience (27.4%) and the least commonly reported was selection based on recommendation by net citizens (0.5%).

Our study indicates that self-medication is widely practiced among students of the college. In this situation, the health care system should create as effective awareness and educatetheir students regarding advantages and disadvantages of self-medication

This study was designed to investigate the ballistic behavior of ceramic-reinforced aluminum composite plates numerically and experimentally and to present an optimal sample design. The parameters studied were ceramic reinforcement percentage and type of matrix alloy. This study used the matrix alloys 6061, 7075, and 5083. The percentage of ceramics used in this study is 15, 30, and 45% by weight. The samples are in three thicknesses of 20, 25, and 30 mm. 27 simulated samples were numerically analyzed with Abaqus finite element software in this study based on existing ballistic protection criteria, one then determines the optimal numerical sample. Using the squeeze casting method, a laboratory sample has been made and experimentally tested to evaluate the numerical results. Lastly, the numerical analysis and the experimental test were compared and the optimal sample was determined.

Identifying and enforcing the rulings and judgments on family lawsuits is so significant due to the relationship of many of them with public order and good domestic morality. Judges should regard factors such as the nationality of each of the litigants, their marital relationship, or their parental relationship in dealing with rulings in family litigation, in addition to applying a limited control system; this issue has been challenging in some cases; therefore, it is required to eliminate the ambiguity of the current laws and increase the judgeschr('39') level of awareness on how to deal with such rulings and judgments. Consequently, this study was conducted in order to examine the social and moral requisites of the legal system to enforce family lawsuits.

Elements such as citizenship, marital residence, marital and parental relationship, and religion of the litigants play a significant role in identifying and enforcing family rulings in addition to the conditions specified in the Civil Code and laws related to the Civil Judgment Enforcement. Analyzes show that the legislature has caused significant ambiguities in this respect by delegating the enforcement of these rulings to the general enforcement of civil rulings, as well as the requirement for the judiciary to examine conflict resolution rules. Notwithstanding, the Family Protection Law of 2011, has examined only a very small dimension of the identification and implementation of these sentences only for the crime committed by the registrar without the presence of enforceable sentences.

This study is devoted to introducing a computational technique based on Bernstein polynomials to solve variable order fractional optimal control problems (VO-FOCPs). This class of problems generated by dynamical systems describe with variable order fractional derivatives in the Caputo sense. In the proposed method, the Bernstein operational matrix of the fractional variable-order derivatives will be derived. Then, this matrix is used to obtain an approximate solution to mentioned problems. With the use of Gauss-Legendre quadrature rule and the mentioned operational matrix, the considered VO-FOCPs are reduced to a system of equations that are solved to get approximate solutions. The obtained results show the accuracy of the numerical technique.

Identifying and enforcing the rulings on family lawsuits is very important in terms of the relationship of many of them to public order and good domestic morality.

This research is a library method.

In identifying and enforcing family judgments, in addition to the conditions set forth in the Civil Code and the Civil Judgments Enforcement Law, elements such as citizenship, the couple's residence, the marital-parental relationship, and the religion of the parties to the lawsuit play an important role. Analyzes indicate that the legislature has left significant ambiguities in this regard by delegating the enforcement of this category of judgments to the general enforcement of civil judgments, as well as the need for the judiciary to explore conflict resolution rules. However, the Family Protection Act of 2011, only for the crime committed by the notary public without the existence of enforceable sentences, has considered only a very small dimension of identification and implementation of these sentences.

In dealing with rulings in family litigation, judges should consider elements such as the nationality of each of the litigants, their marital or parental relationship, in addition to applying a limited control system; This has been challenging in some cases; Therefore, it is necessary to remove the ambiguity of the existing laws and increase the level of awareness of judges on how to deal with such rulings.

Banks, like any other commercial entity, are likely to encounter the risk of insolvency and consequently go bankrupt for some reasons. As the provisions on bankruptcy are subject to the rules and regulations of the Commercial Code, the solution for dealing with a bankrupt bank is to declare its bankruptcy and liquidate its assets. However, declaring a bank’s bankruptcy and going through the bankruptcy process would have an adverse impact on the economy of the country concerned. Banks play a remarkable role in the development and growth of countries’ economy as a result of lending; thus, their existence and operation are highly vital in the development of domestic and international trade. Furthermore, insolvency and bankruptcy of banks would havoc  payment systems and harm the public trust, which eventually result in decline in investments. Therefore, the approach of bankruptcy declaration and liquidation of banking assets exposed to bankruptcy is not a logical approach and it is also not in line with the economic principles. The aim of this article is to discuss the preventive legal tools regarding banks’ bankruptcy, which are at the risk of going bankrupt, in parallel with examining the approach of developed countries in this regard.

In accordance with the definition of Article 1 of the Securities Market Act, a commitment is a third party's commitment to purchase securities that have not been sold within the deadline. The publisher intends to transfer the various risks involved in the filing process to a trusted one. In this way, the underwriting contract is the role of insurance finance in the supply of securities. Given the existing methods in the capital markets of different countries to conclude an accrual contract, this contract can have a different legal nature. In selected capital markets, the obligee accepts the acquisition of securities, while in the capital market of Iran, the ownership of the securities is not transferred to the obligated issuer. By concluding the contract, the publisher will be obliged to enter into a secondary contract. Subject to the obligation contained in this contract, the intention of the parties in the form of a contract cannot be accepted. Unlike the current method in the capital market in the selected countries, this type of commitment creates a personal relationship and covenant between the parties and there is no transfer of ownership involved.

In the present study, an artificial neural network (ANN) model is developed to predict the correlation between the friction stir extrusion (FSE) parameters and the recycled wires’ average grain sizes. FSE is a solid–state synthesis technique, in which machining chips are firstly loaded into the container, and then a rotating tool with a central hole is plunged into the chips at a selected rotational speed and feed rate to achieve indirect extrusion. Selecting rotational speed (RS), vertical speed (VS), and extrusion hole size (HS) as the input and average grain size as the output of the system, the 3–6–1 ANN is used to show the correlation between the input and output parameters. Checking the accuracy of the neural network, R squared value and Root–Mean–Square–Error (RMSE) of the developed model (0.94438 and 0.75794, respectively) have shown that there is a good agreement between experimental and predicted results. A sensitivity analysis has been conducted on the ANN model to determine the impact of each input parameter on the average grain size. The results showed that the rotational speed has more effect on average grain size during the FSE process in comparison to other input parameters.

In this thesis in addition to optimal placement of phasor measurement units (PMUs) a new method is proposed for optimal distribution of measurements redundancy. Since the buses having first order redundancy degrade the system observability by missing their measurements, this method is used to reduce the number of these. On the other hand, the proposed method, in spite of the previous methods, is used to enhance the system observability by improving the redundancy order of the other low order redundancy buses without increasing the number of the lower orders. .In addition, by using this method, the optimal PMU placement can be obtained considering the contingencies such as PMU outage or line outage. It should be noted that the proposed methods are implemented on the IEEE 14-, 30, 57- and 118- bus power networks. The simulation results are compared with previous methods. In addition, simulations are performed with and without considering the effect of zero injection buses.

In this paper, by using numerical method of half-plane boundary element which was previously proposed by the authors for single layer soil was applied for modeling embedded lined water transmission tunnels in the layered-soil medium. In the use of this method, only the boundary of lining and interfaces were required to be discretized. In addition to present the formulation of the mentioned method and verify the results in comparison of the literature, the behavior of a pressure tunnel embedded in two-layer soil was studied. In this regard, the effect of soil layers properties including Poisson ratio and elasticity modulus was investigated to obtain the stress distribution on the ground surface as well as around the tunnel. The results showed that half-plane boundary element method was a simple approach with high accuracy for modeling lined tunnel embedded in the layered soils. Use of this method was recommended for analyzing underground structures and presenting stress patterns in order to correct the existing codes.

According to the widely-Known viewpoint of Imamiyya jurisprudents, the specific performance is prior to the termination of contract, and if the enforcement of the obligor to perform his obligation is not possible due to the necessity of expertise in doing so, the obligee can terminate the contract. Also Iran’s Civil Code has followed this doctrine in Art. 237-239 and 476. The present article, based on the historical, economic and philosophical analysis of Islamic Law, examines and proves that the enforced obligor to specific performance and its primacy to the termination of contract in Imamiyya jurisprudence does not have the necessary efficiency and there is no acceptable legal-jurisprudence justification and it is based on the economic and philosophical interest of jurisprudents, so that clear ruling of traditions. As the finding of the present article, it is proposed to the legislator in the discussion of breach of contractual obligation to anticipate a set of remedy that all of them can be applied across the board. In the event of a breach of obligation, the obligee can choose a remedy that prepares favorably his benefit. Thus the costs and expenses of such a breach haven’t been transferred to society and the consequences of this breach have been managed within the contract by the two parties.

Under cumulativeness of contractual remedies, if such remedies integrate with each other to compensate for the damages caused to the obligee, should allow legal provisions them to simultaneously execute his. Of course, according to specific performance obligor bound enforcement to obligation and primacy termination of contracts and payment of damages should be accepted on an exceptional rule and Primary cumulate may not among these remedies. So, is a direct relationship between these institutions by applying each of them does not implementation another; whereas mentioned legal institutions are Special efficiency and the economic outlook, lawmakers should provide for compatibility between them. Thus, in this article the interaction of economic analysis of interaction precedence of enforcement to specific performance over termination of contract with cumulativeness of contractual remedies and the solution compatibility of consequences of them will be discussed. Including the results of the present paper, provide appropriate proposals for modified Articles of Civil Law in the field of precedence of enforcement to specific performance over termination of contract with cumulativeness of contractual remedies by using ideas of authors of economic analysis of law.

One of the common principles in the legal system of procedure, whether administrative or judicial (civil or criminal) in the sphere of domestic and international law, is the principle of good faith. Through this principle, hearing becomes somhow ethical. This feature has a special place in administrative proceedings, one of which is a general government. The concept of good faith is indeterminate, complex, and twofold, and in determining good faith, there is also a multiplicity of criterion. In each of the criterion, the judge plays a pivotal role in the evaluation of good faith. The criterions for diagnosis are based on two basic psychological and behavioral standards. Good faith has three important duties, corrective and Supplementation. In legislation, as well as in the case law, can be avoided by deception, fraud, collusion and ...of participants in the proceedings, compensating for the vacuum of silence, conflict and ambiguity in the laws, and added to their satisfaction. Without regard to this rule, the procedural defects will increase, and the important function of the procedure, ensuring substantive, will be to endanger.

One of the basic issues in the economic analysis of contract law is the position of remedy enforcement concerning the specific performance along with its connection to the termination of contract and payment of damages which are presented in this study. In fact, the common law and civil law systems have predicted a set of different regulations in this regard. in common law, damages are taken into account as a general remedy for the breach of contractual obligations where in some exceptional cases, an execution of the specific performance is possible. Nonetheless, in civil law systems, a public remedy for breaching contractual obligations is equal to the execution of the specific performance and the termination of contract as well as considering damages as exceptions.
A group of experts in economic analysis of contract law emphasize the efficiency of the precedence of executing the specific performance. To prove their theories, they have cited the neutrality principle and the reliance on the contract as well as the moral obligation of adherence to the obligation. To explain these reasons, it must be pointed out that (1) according to the neutrality principle, the legislator must foresee the remedies of breach of the contractual obligation in a manner that the promisee would remain absolutely neutral between the execution of the specific performance and its termination, in which the precedence of the former on the latter could place the promisee in such a situation; (2) Given the principle of reliance on the contract, both parties would trust the execution of obligation by one another and consequently, various costs would be at stake. Hence, with the precedence of executing the specific performance, such a reliance can be supported while wasting the costs of trusting a contract can be avoided as the execution of obligation is prioritized; (3) According to a common view, morality requires both parties to remain faithful to the obligation and a contract breach is frowned upon. As a result, the precedence of executing the specific performance can terminate motivations toward the breach of contract.
In return, the most important reasons put forth by the advocates of the efficiency in the precedence of termination of contract against the specific performance include the principle of promisee’s self-reliance in the remedy of contractual obligations as well as the fact that such contractual remedies lead to motivation. Consequently, (1) according to the self-reliance principle in contractual remedies, both parties should foresee the probability of the breach of contract with regards to the contractual conditions and states, hence, the contractual remedies must provide self-reliance to both parties when faced with a breach of contract; (2) Based on the principle of providing motivation via contractual remedies, they must be predicted in a way that both parties’ motivations would remain intact in case of perform or breach as well as the payment of damage; meanwhile, with the precedence of executing the specific performance, the promisor would not be motivated to perform or breach the obligation as it must be performed in any case, and the promisee also would not have any motivation to mitigate the damages inflicted upon himself in case of a contract breach.
Considering the methodology of the present study, the authors will employ a combination of methods including explanatory (stating the reasons put forth by both parties regarding the efficiency of the precedence of executing the specific performance or termination of contract), analytical (presenting the selected theory, given the examinations and expressed reasons), comparative (comparison between Iranian and American Law), and formal (difference between the characteristics of contracts concerning the priority of executing the specific performance or the termination of contract). Albeit, given the requirements of the main approach in this paper, first an economic analysis must be employed and eventually, its results must be explained using the aforementioned analysis.
An impediment expressed toward the reasons put forth by the advocates of the precedence of the execution of the specific performance or the termination of contract and the payment of damage is that, overall, the precedence of the execution of the specific performance or the termination of contract cannot be accepted unless it is done according to the contracts’ characteristics such as being regular, consumable, or commercial. The result obtained from the comparative theory is a combination of the reasons put forth by the advocates and the opponents of the precedence of executing the specific performance over the contract termination which is more compatible with the economic components such as efficiency, efficient specification of resources and their optimal usage, increase in social wealth, and the internalization of foreign expenses resulted from the breach of contract.
According to the formal theory, in regular contracts with the subject of transporting present goods, the precedence belongs to the execution of the specific performance; however, in regular contracts with orders on manufacturing goods and providing services, the promisee must be able to choose between the necessity of executing the specific performance or termination of contract. Furthermore, in consumable contracts, the precedence should also belong to the execution of the specific performance, while in commercial contracts, the termination of contract is prioritized.
Given section 2 of Article 716 in the Uniform Commercial Code presented by American legislators, the execution of the specific performance is not accepted as a general remedy of the breach of contractual obligation and, the precedence of executing the specific performance over the payment of damages are taken into account with regards to the certain conditions and states of both claims, leaving the final authority to the judge. As a result, contemporary legislative developments are inclined toward accepting the formal theory on the precedence of executing the specific performance or the termination of contract.
In addition, the factor proving the efficiency of the formal theory is that contractual remedies of necessitating the execution of the specific performance and the termination of contract are closely connected to the majority of legal institutions such as the civil liability of a third party intervener in breach of contract, efficient breach of contract, the rules of the game concerning contract execution/breach, and the ability to accumulate contractual remedies. In this regard, the precedence of executing the specific performance would prevent the realization of these institutions. Meanwhile, accepting the formal theory would provide the context to the Iranian law in which such institutions are realized.

The Asmari Formation at Nil anticline area has been studied in order to determine microfacies, depositional environment and sequence stratigraphy. In the studied section, 10 microfacies belonging to the environments from tidal flat to open sea were identified. Facies assemblages and gradual changes in microfacies column represent deposition on a homoclinal ramp. Based on shallowing and deepening pattern of microfacies and foraminifera distribution, 5 third order depositional sequences have been recognized for the Asmari Formation at this area. These sequenses were correlated with the sequences diagnosed in other parts of Zagros.