فهرست مطالب seyyed mohsen ghaemi khargh

Independence in responsibility is something that has been specified in different legal systems, with different titles and propositions, based on reason and fairness. According to this principle, the government or international organization is responsible for behavior that is considered a violation of their international obligations and is attributed to them. On the other hand, a system of jurisprudential rules such as the minister's rule and its supplementary rules (as the issue of this article) will include provisions for the development and advancement of the principle of independent responsibility. The necessity of the independent international responsibility of the government is one of the most important issues of international law in the contemporary era; Moreover, it has a close relationship with other areas of international law, especially the issue of international peace and security. Therefore, the legal development of this debate based on jurisprudence and its introduction to the field of international law will lead to the development of the guarantee of the implementation of international law and will have useful and valuable effects on the international responsibility of the government. Based on this, the purpose of this descriptive-analytical writing is to develop this legal entity found in the United Nations International Law Commission by presenting the fruits of the jurisprudence rule and its supplementary rules to the field of international law, in order to guarantee The interests of small powers against big powers and the enrichment and efficiency of international law are with the help of Islamic thought.

Abstention is one of the types of votes used in the Islamic Council. This vote, in many cases, has a meaning next to a positive or favorable vote and a negative or opposed vote, and in that case, the person refrains from giving a declarative and expressive vote (positive or negative). Analyzing the acts of governance based on Islamic standards and the necessity of not contradicting these acts with Islamic standards highlights the necessity of this jurisprudential and legal review; in addition to authenticity, the efficient principles and approaches in comparative law can also be used for the legal status of "abstention". Based on this, the main problem of this descriptive-analytical and library paper is that, considering the range of tasks arising from representation, along with the degree of freedom of action and moral life for the representative, as well as the necessities governing decision-making in different situations, what an abstention in the two areas of "assignment ruling" and "status ruling: interpretation of the status of the abstained vote" is? Among the results of Anake's paper, in jurisprudence and comparative law, different approaches have been adopted in facing this issue; but in jurisprudence, the majority of statements and bases are guided by the prohibition and impermissibility of abstention in the initial situation; at the same time, on a case-by-case and exceptional basis, in some cases, it is possible to prescribe abstention. Among other principles governing the abstention vote is the principle of transparency and the principle of relative legal value, which will open a middle way for "application" and "interpretation of the abstention vote" based on the evidence or the previous certain situation.

expertise and thematics for Shari'a rulings or legislation in the Al-Faragh area can not be considered apart from society and its requirements. Social realities have sometimes been a catalyst for Islamic legislation and sometimes an obstacle to legislation or the implementation of sharia law. However, the jurisprudential attitude to the dimensions of public law and the possibility and extension of attention to the sociability of law, as well as the permission and extension of silence in legislation, as the issue of this paper, is what has put the act of legislation in the test of jurisprudential sociology. And the two strategies advance the necessity of the socialization of the law and the silence of the law (against inflation in legislation). The importance of this descriptive-analytical paper, using a  library method is due to the fact that it mainly tries to multiply legislation with an integral view of Sharia, regardless of social contexts, and the necessity of the position of the Islamic Consultative Assembly as a productive and dynamic source of normalization. While the pathology of this process, has achieved a strategy of gradual (sociability of law) and necessity (silence towards legislation and in legislation) based on jurisprudential and legal principles and documents.

In "art rights", the owners of theatrical behaviors in public manifestations such as theater are considered as the subject of rights and duties. The strategy or aspect of "creating rights and obligations" at the threshold of religious sovereignty and in the context of "government jurisprudence" constitutes the main axis of the present article. Basically, what rights and requirements do cinematographers and religious authorities have? It is worth mentioning that the "right of religious sovereignty over cinematographers" is not limited to such norms. The nature of private-public rights of art and media rights requires the influence of religious sovereignty on the scope and narrowness of the rights of this group of artists on their performance work, including in the form of supervision of the work or restrictions on "intellectual property rights", "the right to being forgotten" should also be examined next. Also, this article will take into account the scope and nature of these rights in the government requirements and with respect to the rights of cinematographers. The following study is conducted through descriptive-analytical method and library studies.

Ossol amaliya as a method of removing confusion in the absence of a definite and valid reason is a solution that has been followed mainly in individual jurisprudence and in private and criminal law. In public law and governance, including economic, political and cultural, in some cases, these principles have been the basis of action of various institutions. However, this article, in line with the methodology of public law and international law, recognizes the difference between the method of interpretation of religious sources and the need to improve the criteria for inferring rulings in order to prevent the isolation or distortion of religion. Therefore, the main issue of this descriptive-analytical research is the possibility or refusal to invoke Ossol amaliya as well as the method of invoking these principles in governance. It seems that in line with the "necessity of establishing and completing the language of the Shari'a in order to understand history", the Ossol amaliya are not suitable language for the level of governance and can only be used in governance in the form of "approach". The taste of the Shari'a also greatly enhances the preservation of the system of citing Ossol amaliya