Application of the concept contrary to the prophetic tradition in jurisprudential hadiths (worship section)

The Prophetic tradition is considered the second source of ijtihad and inference of the branches of religion and religious rules after the Qur'an. In this collection ،he deals with the hadiths of jurisprudence in which the prophetic tradition is cited and typifies their arguments and then presents them in the jurisprudential books of Shiite jurists to show how they interact with such arguments of the Imams. Pure (pbuh) examines and evaluates their behavior with the behavior of the pure Imams according to the prophetic tradition and answers the question of whether the jurists behaved like the pure Imams (pbuh) in their jurisprudential citations or behaved differently Have they? Is it possible to obtain a rule or a general rule or even a general one derived from these arguments and citations and use them in the course of ijtihad or not? Have the jurists done this? The main purpose of this study is to analyze the arguments of the Imams (as) in extracting jurisprudential rulings and citing and applying the Prophetic tradition ،as well as how they are used and the quality of their use in Shiite jurisprudential books ،including Jawahar al-Kalam. Is twelve. The method of data collection in this study ،due to the technicality of the discussion ،relies entirely on the use of library and filing methods ،so referring to Shiite jurisprudential sources and examining their jurisprudential views is one of the strategies for writing this study accurately and correctly. One of the results of this research is the reason for citing the Prophetic tradition by the pure Imams (PBUH).