The effect of subjectivism on political thought in Iran between the two constitutional and Islamic revolutions(Case Study: Ideology Building)

Political thought in Iran, especially at a time when it was maturing, was a combination of subjectivism in the guise of new Islamic, national, and civilizational discourses that applied a eliminatory approach to rivals. In this research, the author establishes a logical link between the roots and function of the dominant discourses in political thought, considering their elimination approach to each other in the period between the two revolutions. In this discussion, it is assumed that the political thinker, both in the form of discourse and as an individual element, has an irregular mentality that distances itself from the conventional approach of political thought, which is based on critical methodology. Dogmatic approach, drawing the utopia and subjective determinism become the dominant approach in each of the new Islamic, national and civilizational discourses. Each of these maverick discourses in dealing with a new aspect called "tradition" enters into this discussion, which results in intellectual confusion, intolerance of the opposition, and the use of an exclusionary approach, resulting in ideology. The subject of the discussion is the historical attitudes of political ideas in Iran, which has continued to this day through "monolithic discourse" in politics and has neglected the dialectic of political thought and has had a destructive effect on social and political elements.