مجله حقوقی دادگستری
پیاپی 121 (بهار 1402)

The performance of professional jobs for the public interest of society and their entry into the field of public services, doubles the need for government intervention in regulating the rules governing their performance. The present study, by exploiting the studies of the control library and adopting an analytical-descriptive approach, in order to explain the components of government intervention in regulating the legal profession, has reached the conclusion that contrary to the idea, the UK government intervenes in three levels of criteria. Governing the "structure and organization of the legal profession", "how to enter the legal profession" and "professional tenure" to pay the legal regime governing the legal profession is paid. Items such as "Determining the legal nature of the Bar Association", "Comprehensive government oversight of the Bar Association and the legal profession", "Regulation in the field of advocacy", "Reporting the Bar Association's obligation to nine government governments", "Reviewing the Bar Association's request and supervision On the approvals of the pillars and management components of the association "," Obligation to apply transparency in the performance of bar associations "," Determining the conditions of representation and admission "," Intervention of lawyers' training "," Intervention in the names in the list of lawyers "," Establishment of lawyers 'disciplinary courts and investigation of their violations "," Regulation of public oversight of Uber Bar Associations "," Regulation of government oversight mechanism in Bar Associations "," Supervision of lawyers' training "," Determining the amount and "How to obtain attorneys' fees", "Suspension and revocation of attorney's license", "Prohibition of attorney by qualified persons", "Control over employees and attorneys" and finally "Regulation of the mechanism of attorneys and non-attorneys" are examples of government intervention in England The establishment of bar associations in this country is considered.

In this article, "Application of the principle of equality in guaranteeing impartial criminal proceedings" has been researched by descriptive-analytical method. Examining the dimensions and angles of the principles of "equality" and "impartiality" set forth in Articles 2 and 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and explaining the commonalities and differences and explaining the role of these two rituals in evaluating the performance of judges and the legislator's guarantee policy, are among the objectives of this study. Although the emphasis on the implementation of the principle of equality in the constitution indicates the privileged position of this principle in the judicial security of the country, but, the findings of the study suggest that the legislature in implementing its criminal policy, has not used all the capabilities of this important in standardizing the behavior of judges and in the face of global conventions and the strategy of the unity of international law, it has not adopted a clear strategy. The result is that, today the capability and authority of the system has the ability to technically revise the laws in accordance with the fixed and changing principles of Islam and Jafari dynamic jurisprudence and in accordance with the requirements of the time, and declare its firm position on conflicting issues. By specifying the role of the psychological element in violations and stating the prohibition of violation of the principles of equality and impartiality in different stages of the trial along with appropriate punishments, the criterion of justification of judicial rulings should also be stated and prevented the accumulation and formation of cases subject to the provisions of Article 477 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

As the emergence of the internet has brought a lot in all scientific and practical positive aspects, ‎with the possibility ‎of accessing intellectual property rights, it has created challenges in this ‎field. One of the common examples of ‎violation of these rights has been the phenomena of ‎cybersquatting, which the authors of this article should know by ‎examining the methods and ‎has raised the central question of legal ways to resolve the dispute caused by that. In ‎the ‎present research, first by descriptive method, the concepts of trademark, domain name, and ‎cybersquatting have ‎been defined. Then, with a method of analysis and comparison, the ‎process of hearing this category of claims in the ‎WIPO Mediation and Arbitration Center ‎with references to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy ‎‎(icon), it has been ‎examined and compared with the existing methods in some national and regional law ‎systems.‎The findings of this research will reveal while the principle of the jurisdiction of the courts is universal, and there is ‎no doubt about the possibility of litigation in the national judiciary, still, the disadvantages of such a method, such as ‎the choice of the competent authority, the rule of law, and the execution of verdicts, have always led the parties to the ‎arbitration. In this regard, the UDRP rules contain rules for dealing with such claims that many countries have tried ‎to settle disputes arising out of the registration of a domain that is contrary to the rights of the trademark owner by ‎localizing its rules; The United Kingdom, Australia, and ASEAN members, among others, have different approaches. ‎

The phenomenon of terrorism is spreading throughout the world. It has been particularly prevalent since the beginning of the last quarter of the twentieth century. A comparative study of national and transnational criminal policy regarding the phenomenon of terrorism confirms that the dominant perspective and the governing system of criminal policies in the world, whether national or transnational, are security-oriented and have antagonist policies: thus, terrorist criminals are described as "enemies of society", "dangerous criminals" and "non-rehabilitative" and are even at the forefront of dangerous criminals. Also, they are treated based on the punitive, dissuasive, and incapacitation criminal philosophy. But it seems that the antagonist criminal policy against terrorist offenders should be reversed to establish a restorative discourse with the aim of application of restorative responses. A response to terrorism crimes should not be limited to tough penal and zero-tolerance policies. In addition to these policies and measures, promoting reintegration and rehabilitation of the perpetrators for the purpose of preventing the recidivism seems to be important and necessary. The researcher tries to defend the theory of the "possibility of restoration of anti-terrorist criminal policy" with a descriptive-analytical approach and a focus on foreign law. He introduces this theory as a necessary strategy for the legislator. The author argues that policies derived from antagonist criminal law theory are promoters of terrorism and cannot and should not become the main strategy of counter-terrorism criminal policy. Rather, the appropriate criminal strategy for dealing with terrorist crimes is to design a combined criminal policy to use a combination of restorative and criminal measures, depending on the personality and status of the terrorist offenders. In this combined approach, in parallel, it is possible to apply restorative justice programs and punitive responses to terrorist offenses at the same time. And in case of failure of the restorative response and "despairing of restorative justice", the criminal process and the punitive response can be pursued.

The formal law education system in several universities in a significant number of countries has for more than three decades experienced the relatively rapid development of institutions called "Law Clinics". This institution is a special establishment in faculties of law with dual educational and service / social functions. In our country, the above idea has been designed and implemented with different models from a decade ago in a number of governmental and non-governmental universities in the country. Considering the development of the mentioned institutions in recent years and the necessity of setting the necessary legal frameworks for preparing and approving the rules and regulations related to the establishment and operation of law clinics, the leading research with descriptive-analytical method, while examining the concept of the above idea, Its functions and benefits seek to answer the question of what are the legal and extra-legal challenges and requirements for establishing university law clinics in Iran? According to the findings of this study, the effective establishment of this institution in Iran will not be possible without solving the numerous financial, administrative and educational challenges. The special emphasis of this research is on the necessity of adopting necessary solutions and arrangements to provide sufficient financial resources required for the establishment and operation of law clinics, approval of relevant legal documents by competent authorities and design of an appropriate educational system for full and effective implementation of the above idea. Thus, the legal system and the higher education system of Iran have not yet provided the conditions and requirements for the establishment and then the establishment and development of these clinics; Of course, this can only be achieved through the mutual cooperation of government authorities and non-governmental organizations, as well as the community of lawyers. I

Non- profit damage is one of the complex and controversial issues in Iran's legal system that disputes arise from Note 2 of Article 515 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1379; The enactment of the Criminal Procedure Code of1392,which in Article 14 and Note 2,there are changes compared to the previous law,Not only has it not removed the ambiguity, but it has added to it.In order to remove the existing ambiguities,first of all, non-profit Must be analyzed in jurisprudence And with a new perspective on the concept of property,benefit and profit, we must examine the issue that the damage to non-profit(profit)is guaranteed?Is it a non-profit property that is wasted?Why in Note2to Article14, is the only loss of possible benefits guaranteed?This research examines these issues with a library tool and with a descriptive-analytical method.Using the available data, property can be divided into1-identical 2- benefit 3-potential benefit 4-imaginary benefit and assumed the properties that are in the property of individuals in four forms:1- existing,2- potentially existing; in the view of actual custom, 3- potentially existing; and in the view of extinct custom,4- extinct.Non-profit or the same profit in the sense of fictitious benefit of property is not assumed and therefore, can't be claimed. On the other hand, loss of potential benefit and benefit, in the case of existing potential benefit, in the case of extinct custom in terms of non-validity of property, Does not create a guarantee, and in the case of existing potential benefit (in the view of actual custom), in the sense that custom's property applies to the guarantee. Note2:Article 14 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeks to express the possibility of losing the existing potential benefit and in the view of actual custom, and mentioning the loss as a means of guarantee is included in the prevailing case.

The Code of Civil Procedure does not specify whether a verdict challenged by a third party is final or whether a non-final verdict can be challenged by a third party. In this regard, different and reciprocal views and analyzes are presented. The statement of Article 422 of the Code of Civil Procedure regarding the objection of a third party, before the execution of the sentence and after it, is vague and debatable and has several problems. Examining the issue shows that considering various aspects, it is preferable not to consider the non-final verdict as objectionable to a third party and to consider the third party objection as specific to the final judgment. Article 422 of the Code of Civil Procedure should also be taken to mean that if a long period of time has elapsed since the execution of the sentence, in such a way as to indicate that the third party, if he had a right, waived it, after that, the third party objection will not be accepted unless it proves otherwise.

In cases where one of the parties to the contract, for any reason, does not want or cannot fulfill its obligations in due time, the other party faces an unforeseen or anticipatory breach. Anticipatory breach of contract causes essential and consequential damages to the other party. Contractual damages often result from an actual breach of contract. However, Anticipatory breach can also lead to essential and consequential damages. Some contractual damages do not arise directly from a breach of contract, but are usually in the normal and reasonable course of affairs to breach of contract. However, the possibility of compensating for such damages is facing with a major problem in Iranian law. The most important impediment to compensating for such losses is the possibility and lack of customary causal relationship between the damage and the harmful act. This research seeks to assess the feasibility of compensating for consequential damages arising from Anticipatory breach of contract in Iranian law by analytical-descriptive method and by invoking to certain jurisprudential and legal principles and rules such as La-Zarar (No-Harm), reciprocity, assumption of the wise and the governance of will.

Policymakers, under the influence of the Drug Conventions, penalize drug crimes based on their degree of danger or harmfulness. Given the importance of this issue, by using a descriptive-analytical method and studying the regulations of drugs and psychotropic substances in the criminal justice system, we studied the main issue dangerousness of substances and how they are scheduled. The provisions of controlled substances in the US has also been reviewed. we conclude that in the Iranian legal system, despite the phrase "other drugs or non-pharmaceutical industrial Psychotropic", there is no criteria for evaluating the dangerousness of drugs, but in the United States, the controlled substances act based on some criteria categorized the substances in five schedule. The need for classifying the substance in situations where there is no criterion for scheduling them can intensify the old fears and change the situation in favor of tighter controls, including severe penalties. This has been done in relation to some types of substances, through the Antidrug Abuse Act. Understanding the concept of "dangerousness" as a social construction, can create different possibilities in the process and the result of assessing the dangerous of drugs. The performance of decision-making authorities also intensifies this process.

 The principle of immutability of the elements of litigation prevents unregulated seizures of the elements of litigation. Any change in the claim is subject to the conditions set forth in Article 98 of the Code of Civil Procedure. These considerations are in line with the principle of compliance and protection of the defendant's rights against any surprises, The subject of the lawsuit and the transferee is the beneficiary in the lawsuit and has caused the creation of a new document resulting from this transfer and apparently has challenged the petition. The protection of the law is primarily the duty of the law and then the court, and the silence, ambiguity or conciseness of the law should not be used as a pretext by a party who has found himself convicted and intends to exclude the case from the hearing and hear the case. Sterilize the case. This research with a descriptive analytical method leads to the conclusion that by paying attention to these two changes in the elements of litigation, the gap can be filled and the judge can be given the ability to pay attention to the legal action. , At the same time as inviting the transferee to the trial, make a change in the request It is also considered as one of the effects of transferring the lawsuit and in parallel with considering the request stated in the petition, forcibly decides in the voting session on the new request and also on the document belonging to the deputy, either negatively or positively, because The authority extends its contents to the proceedings, including the recent document created during the hearing of the case, which, following the summoning of the deputy to the proceedings, a decision is also made regarding this document.

Begging as a social phenomenon and behavior. Governments' responses to this phenomenon vary, encompassing a wide range of approaches, from mere criminalization to non-criminalization.In Article 712 of the Islamic Penal Code (1996), the legislator has considered the absolute commission of this act as a crime. On the other hand, Criminalization, is a process based on rationality and is done by taking into account social realities. Therefore, it is necessary to examine other models to assess the position of the Iranian criminal justice system in the face of this phenomenon. Accordingly, a comparative study of the reaction of sixteen countries to this phenomenon shows that the four countries of Iran, England, Wales and Denmark have absolutely criminalized begging: Eight countries in France, Germany, Scotland, Belgium, Jordan, Singapore, Turkey and Switzerland have criminalized this behavior on the condition that it be disruptive, aggressive and abusive, and that children and vulnerable people are abused, and four countries: Sweden, Norway, Malaysia and Canada have not criminalized or decriminalized this behavior, as the case may be.

Proof of ownership litigation in the various stages of property registration, there are rules about how to register such property, which must be taken into account, especially in real estate, which is subject to legal requirements and formalities and such a request cannot be accepted absolutely in all immovable property with a single shape and quality. Action for ownership Proof is one of civil action that there are many differences of verdicts about accepting or rejecting it in legal authorities ,so that some of courts has accepted action for ownership Proof based on precedent No. 569 dated Dec.31,1991 of General Board of Supreme Court of Iran and believe that Legal obligation of owner to demand for their self-property registration in part which Public registration of real estate is advertised , not prevented that courts of justice adjudicate about disputes over property ownership and in some of courts avoid from such action by virtue of article 22,46,47 and 48 of Real Property Law and contents of precedent No. 672 dated Dec.21,2004 of General Board of Supreme Court of Iran and also contents law of course to pursue land without official deed. In present article , we review proof of ownership is basically devoid of description of the claim and opposition to the principle or appearance and it is merely a form of litigation that the courts are not the reference of the preparation of the case. The authority to declare ownership of immovable property is the registration authorities.

The enforcement of verdict is the most important stage of the litigation process in which attempted to execution of the verdict through the introduction and identification of the property of losing party. In this regard, a large part of the Civil Verdicts Enforcement Act and the Execution Method of Financial Convictions Act dedicated to this issue. A look to these laws shows that laws generally recognize customary objective property and stated the manner in which the judgment debt can be executed from there. However, in the last decade, following the development of new technologies, digital currencies have emerged as rivals of real currencies and have gained public acceptance. Although laws on these currencies has not been approved in Iranian legal System so far, but the doctrine and judicial procedure has issued that these currencies is property. In this regard, this question arises if at the time of execution of the verdict, digital currency identified and introduced - as the property of the losing property– does the convict can be executed from these currencies? According to the results of this research, the answer to this question is yes. This study, after mentioning an introduction on the nature of digital currencies, deals with the issue of the ability to identify, seize and sell digital currencies and some of its important sub-categories. Although the relevant laws do not provide for a regulation on these currencies, the implementation of judicial rulings from these currencies will be facilitated by relying on the general principles governing the implementation of rulings and the formulation of transparent rules in the future and training of judges. It will prevent the fragmentation of procedures. This research tries to answer the issues that are raised in the implementation of court rulings from the place of digital currencies in a descriptive-analytical method.

According to thin skull rule in common law accused must take his victim as he finds him. This accepted by Iran and common law legal system with respect to child, old and who suffers from physical and mental disorder so that their weakness is considered in the imputation of bodily harms to accused. It means that accused must consider his victim’s voluntarily and involuntarily reaction. This rule is accepted just about by two law systems in the scope of automatic physical act and psychological reactions of victim and even on the ground of necessity or duress. But in the case of the victim’s unreasonable voluntarily reactions resulted from his or her belief, the rule has been accepted in Blaue1975, nevertheless it was subsequently interpreted differently by lawyers. In Iran law according to Islamic jurisprudence and positive law the imputation of the result to the accused in this situation is doubtful and can not be accepted.

According to Article 217 of the Criminal Procedure Code, one of the most important purposes of issuing criminal security contracts is to "guarantee the rights of the victim and compensate him / her for damages". However, according to the explicitness of Article 690 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, criminal security contracts for crimes of legal entities are limited to two, the use of which, unlike criminal security contracts of natural persons (Article 217), is not mandatory and "at the discretion" of the official. Judicial is assigned. In the present study, a descriptive-analytical method has been used, using library resources to critique and review criminal security agreements and judicial supervision of crimes of legal entities in order to guarantee the rights of victims. Legal appointments are not commensurate with the severity and extent of the crimes in which legal entities today engage and victimize large numbers of individuals, especially in the financial and economic spheres, and legislative reforms are in line with many countries. It provides for a variety of criminal security agreements for legal entities and has also allowed the use of other agreements, such as bail agreements. Also, in the field of judicial supervision, despite the legal ambiguity and of course against the opinion of some legal writers, it seems that some of the provisions of this contract can be used in relation to these persons in proportion to the crime committed by the legal person.

Moral loss is a kind of harm which damages the person,s non-financial right. At first, there was doubt about the possibility of compensation for this type of loss. For example, in the USA legal system, they did not pay enough attention to victim,s moral losses as they do for financial losses. It was argued that moral damages are not visible and so we don’t know the real loss and we should trust just to the victim. In addition, the lack of a structured method of compensation and assessment, makes this kind of loss, secondary damages. How ever, especially, using the psychology Science, courts gradually began to accept moral damages.In Iran, Also there was doubt about moral damages. But today Due to the criminal procedure code which approved in 1392, the compensation for moral damages is acceptable. But what is still vague, is the method. How ever, it seems using some methods like apologize or financial compensation are more practical.Ofcourse in each case this is the judge who should recognize which approach is better and proportional to the plaintiff and his personal loss. In this article we try to study the methods of moral compensation in Iran legal system, and we will use the American studies about this subject and also the cases which raised in Iran judicial procedure.