جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « differences in readings » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

Through scientific readings, it is possible to identify the consensus or difference of opinion of the transmitters of God’s book. There is a close relationship between Qur’anic readings and Arabic language; because the Qur’an is the most influential factor in establishing and formulating Arabic rules; that is why the first grammarians of the Arabic language were part of the Qur’an reciters. There is a difference between reciters in the recitation of certain verses of the Qur’an. The difference in reading has an ancient background and it is a historical fact that there is no reason to deny.In this article, using the descriptive-analytical method, cases of disagreement among the reciters of the seven modes of the Qur’an recitations (qarā’āt-i sab‘a) in the first part (juz’) of the Holy Qur’an, with the help of philology, diacritics, and orthoepy (tajwīd) books, and by explaining the causes of slips, have been investigated in two phonetic and structural sections. The results of this research show that among the schools of qarā’at, the Kufians have performed more successfully than others. Āṣim Kufi has the least slips among the seven reciters, and Ḥafṣ’ narration of Āṣim has the most compliance with the rules of Arabic literature, and in contrast, Qunbul, the narrator of Ibn Kathir Makki, has the weakest performance in reading.

process of correcting and editing the verses of the Qur'an has been done by the Prophet under the title of abrogation, which requires distortion of the Qur'an. The Sunnis have documented this view of Orientalists. In this research, which has been written with a descriptive-analytical approach, while reviewing the views of orientalists such as Blasher and others about abrogation, the views of Shiite and Sunni commentators have been expressed and it has been proved that contrary to orientalists, abrogation means modification or change of ruling. It is not an edition, but as the great Shiite scholars and scholars have said, it means the end of the time of ruling and expediency, and it applies only to a few verses. In addition, according to Shiite scholars and Sunni scholars, the recitation of the Qur'an is not correct and is not in the Qur'an because it requires the distortion of the Qur'an.d

Authentic recitation of the Holy Quran, in the literal sense, the quality of the letters and words of the Holy Quran is one of the most important and fundamental questions about reading the text of the Holy Quran. Different solutions to answer this question have been given by Shiite scholars. The famous recitation, as a valid recitation, is the solution of the jurists and the late fundamentalists in choosing the correct recitation. This research tries to achieve a valid reading in the eyes of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) by using the method of historical study of documents and evidences and uses narrations as a historical evidence to recognize the authentic reading in the eyes of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS). Examination of the narrative evidence shows that the reading that the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) have used as a criterion in interpretation is consistent with the reading known as the narration of Hafs from Asim and which is famous in the Islamic worldevidence to recognize the authentic reading in the eyes of the Ahl al-Bayt (AS). Examination of the narrative evidence shows that the reading that the Ahl al-Bayt (AS) have used as a criterion in interpretation is consistent with the reading known as the narration of Hafs from Asim and which is famous in the Islamic world

The knowledge of reciting the Qur'an deals with the ways of reciting and pronouncing the words of the Qur'an. Differences in recitation due to the differences in these methods can play an important role in understanding the words and verses of the Holy Quran. The role of “ikhtilafu’l Qiraat” [differences among recitations] can be examined from different aspects. This article intends to investigate the role of structural and conceptual differences in the meaning of the verses of one of the chapters of the Holy Quran based on data collection and descriptive-analytical method. Therefore, it has benefited.from the two commentaries of Al-Kashaf (by Zamakhshari) and Al-Tahrir and Al-Tanwir (by Ibn Ash'ur) as two famous Sunni commentaries and the commentary of Majma 'al-Bayan (by Tabarsi) and Tebyan (by Tusi) as two famous Shiite commentaries that pay special attention to the meaning of verses. Surah Al-Kahf is a suitable example for the mentioned subject due to having a suitable volume of differences in readings. From the point of view of these commentators, among the 110 verses of Surah Al-Kahf, in 44 verses, there is a difference in recitation. The differences were observed that in 21 verses, are limited to the utterance of words and cases of Sajavandi that have no semantic effect, and in 23 verses, the difference in reading leads to a slight semantic change that can be ignored and it is not considered evidence of the distortion of this divine book.

One of the issues raised about the reasons for the difference in Qur’anic readings is the issue of expertion (ijtihad), which is raised under the title of ijtihad of reciters and companions. Great figures such as Ayatollah Khoei and Ayatollah Maarefat have raised the issue of ijtihad in recitation. In this article, which is written in a descriptive-analytical method, the reasons for and against the discussion of ijtihad on the issue of differences in readings were examined. The main reason for the agreement was the practice of the tastes of the companions and the reciters, which has been mentioned as one of the important factors in influencing the difference of readings. While the opponents have considered the recitations as evidence based on listening and narration and have stated that ijtihad in recitation has been confused with the word ikhtiar in recitation. But by referring to the history of recitations, it becomes clear that ijtihad existed in recitations and these ijtihads are not done only by a few unknown people whom that most Muslims has ignored.

The commentators of the Qur'an in their interpretive efforts have not been needless to refer to the Qur’anic readings (qira'at). Therefore, although some Qur'anic scholars have considered the Qur'an and the recitations as two different facts. However, they considered the diligence of recitations in facing the interpretation of the Qur'an to be inevitable. Among these, the interpretation of Rawd al-Jannan can be mentioned as the first Shiite commentary in Persian that has quoted and presented opinions in the face of differences in readings. This descriptive-analytical study examines Razi's approach in the face of various readings and eventually believes that he was not required to explain the interpretation of the verses to a specific reading, but by mentioning the differences with different narrative, literary and interpretive criteria and ... tries to prefer a single reading. In some cases, this reading is not the reading of Hafs from Asim. Also, sometimes the commentator's interpretive perceptions have been influenced by his reading preference.

One of the technical issues regarding to the Quran, is the Theory of "multiple revelation" based on the traditions of the " Seven ‎ Letters". Regardless identify the cause's expression of the traditions of the Prophet (pbuh), what is very important and has made numerous disagreements among Shiite scholars to be created, is express the traditions confirmed that theory by Imam Sadiq (AS) and Imam Baqir (AS). Since these narratives, in appearance, disagree with other narratives regarding the revelation of the Qur'an to the "single word" and cause a discussion about the distortion of the Quran, Therefore, in this research, it has been tried using the two methods of "Sentimental Criticism" and "Historical Analysis" and attention to the discourse governing the era of the Imams (AS), the reason for the issuance of these narratives and its relation with the social religious trends of the early history of Islam Explaining a new perspective on understanding these narratives. Considering the flow of cereals, studying their motivation for discussing the issue of Quranic recitation and the way Ahl al-Bayt (AS) confronts these false ideas is one of the issues discussed in this article.