مقالات رزومه دکتر سید محسن میرباقری

Participatory governance provides the basis for people's decision-making, implementation and supervision by them in social and political relations, and after that, this model can lead to the growth and development of members of society, strengthening social capital, increasing justice and social cohesion. Through investigations, we can extract a lot of evidence about the importance and dimensions of participatory governance in religious teachings and traditions. One of the successful samples of participatory governance in the present era is the phenomenon of Arba'een Pilgrimage, which has attracted the attention of many politicians and researchers. Identifying the dimensions and effects of this rare phenomenon can clarify the way to achieve participatory governance in the social, cultural, political and economic fields. Therefore, important interviews have been conducted with Shia thinkers regarding the dimensions and effects of the Arba'een Pilgrimage. These interviews have been analyzed with the qualitative method of thematic analysis, and the indications identified in them have been categorized under the three-pronged model. This model provides indications of participation in the Arba'een Pilgrimage based on context, structure and content. By identifying the different dimensions of this great social participation and examining its implications, this phenomenon can be used as a successful operational model to realize participatory governance in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Participatory governance is one of the most successful approaches to public policy and management. This approach reduces many social and political tensions and challenges and leads to an increase in social capital. But the lack of knowledge of the effective methods and tools in this approach has prevented the optimal use of this approach. In this article, the methods and tools of participatory governance in the field of politics are examined. The method of this research is content analysis, and using this method, data has been collected and checked with the help of library and internet sources, and then, by analyzing the collected data, the methods and tools of participatory governance have been extracted. In the following, with the help of 31 experts and academic and organizational experts in this field, the desired components have been identified with 16 indicators and in two main categories of methods and tools. The findings show that 8 methods of voting, surveying and polling, consultation, collective decision-making, production of common literature, networking and team building, information sharing, and collective work are among the most important methods of implementing participatory governance, and 8 tools such as virtual platforms, free-thinking seats, elections, marches, Friday prayers, gatherings and protests, social media, and think tanks are among the most important political tools of participatory governance in the country.

Participatory governance is one of the successful approaches in public management and community administration. This approach reduces many challenges and problems in society and leads to an increase in social capital. To solve complex and multi-layered social issues and problems, successful governments work hard to improve public participation. But sometimes the lack of knowledge of effective methods and tools in this approach makes it not optimally used. In this article, the methods and tools of participatory governance in the socio-cultural field are examined. The method of this research is content analysis and using this method, data has been collected and checked with the help of library and internet sources, and then, by analyzing the collected data, the methods and tools of participatory governance have been extracted. In the following, with the help of 32 experts and academic and organizational experts in this field, the desired components have been identified with 17 indicators and in two main categories of methods and tools. The findings show that 8 methods of voting, surveying and polling, consultation, collective decision-making, production of common literature, networking and team building, information sharing, and collective work are among the most important methods of implementing participatory governance and 9 tools such as social media, social innovators, voluntary groups, a system of criticisms and suggestions, virtual platforms, educational texts, art, commanding good and forbidding evil and holding meetings are among the most important social and cultural tools of participatory governance in the country.

In order to achieve the desired standardization in the field of artificial intelligence and its accurate evaluation and to build trust in the processes and systems based on artificial intelligence, it is necessary to review the standards developed in this regard at the international and national level.Due to the wide and important applications of artificial intelligence, today artificial intelligence standardization is on the agenda of most standardization organizations.the purpose of this research is comparative study of organization and international institutions for standardization of artificial intelligence , the european telecommunications standards institute , the international telecommunication union and also the national institutions and institutions such as the german standardization institute , england and denmark as valid and pioneering organizations in the field of artificial intelligence . the results indicate that due to the high importance of artificial intelligence and the importance of countries to it , the international organization for standardization has devoted its activities to standards related to artificial intelligence .the results indicate that due to the high importance of artificial intelligence and the importance of countries to it , the international organization for standardization has devoted its activities to standards related to artificial intelligence .Also, the survey of artificial intelligence standardization organizations shows that among the eight main areas of artificial intelligence, the highest number of standard document compilations has been done in the field of artificial intelligence concepts and the lowest number of standard document compilations has been done in the field of natural language processing. The results of this article can create a new insight for future forecasting and prioritizing the importance of artificial intelligence areas for managers and significantly contribute to the process of artificial intelligence standardization.

The main issue in management science is decision making, and the success or failure of any manager can be considered dependent on his decisions. One of the methods that can help a lot in the correctness of managers' decisions is collective decision-making. This article tries to explain the concepts related to collective decision making and then the most important questions related to this method are answered using the grounded theory method. In this article, using the semi-structured interview, the opinions of 36 organizational and academic experts have been used. After collecting data through interviews, the components were coded openly, axially, and selectively. The results show that there are 35 concepts around the central phenomenon of collective decision-making that can be divided into 6 categories: causal conditions, contextual conditions, intervening conditions, central phenomenon, strategies, and consequences. An important innovation of this paper is the presentation of a collective decision model using the grounded theory method that can convey useful information to managers in a concise manner, and motivate them to use this method.

The purpose of this article is to design a collective decision-making model based on the fundamentals of Islamic society. Group decision-making is the process by which a group of people makes a single decision on a particular issue to achieve their goals. To understand the path to achieving a group decision, one must first identify the factors that affect it.

The method of this research was content analysis and using this method, the data are collected and reviewed using library resources. Then, with the analysis of the obtained data, the important features of decision-making in Islamic foundations are identified and the process of reaching a collective decision becomes transparent. Then, with the help of 21 academic and organizational experts in this field, the model was designed with 19 indicators and three main components of common beliefs, cognitive rationality, and practical rationality.

The findings show that the identity of Muslims is differentiated from non-Muslims in the form of four relations of the human relationship with God, the world, society, and oneself.

The authors of the article conclude that if a group has the same cognitive rationality, it can achieve the same practical rationality, which leads the group to attain a common decision and ultimately team work.

Participatory governance is one of the successful approaches in the world in the field of governance. Surveys show that providing a participatory governance model following the religious foundations along with the cultural and social issues of the country will help a lot in solving governance challenges. The research purpose is to present a conceptual model of participatory governance in Iran based on the foundation's data analysis. The tool used to collect information in this study was a semi-structured interview that used the opinions of 27 experts in this field. The sampling method was purposeful. After collecting the data, based on the grounded theory method, the concepts are coded openly, centrally, and selectively. With the coding performed, 25 concepts were obtained which were classified into 5 categories: causal conditions, contextual conditions, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences and are presented as a model for the central phenomenon of Participatory governance. The findings show factors such as not feeling the need for participatory governance and understanding its benefits, the distance between the elites and the people with the governing institutions and increasing tensions, weakness of collaborative work culture, weakness in reaching understanding and gathering opinions, inadequate understanding of people's behaviors and mental models and the different nature of governance in Islam and the West are the causal conditions of participatory governance. Also, factors such as increasing progress in the country, increasing cohesion in society, increasing justice in society, and increasing productivity in the country are the most important achievements of participatory governance in the country.

Collective decision-making is the process by which a group of people makes a single decision on a particular issue to achieve improvement by realizing their goal. Collective decision-making is known as one of the most important ways to achieve optimal decision-making. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive picture of the dimensions of collective decision-making and to answer a set of related questions in this field via a systematic literature review (SLR). In this regard, in the first part, the collective decision-making will be introduced and the SLR protocol will be examined in 5 steps. In the next section, the most important keywords and areas of research are identified and a co-word analysis map in the field of collective decision-making is drawn for the period between 1990 and March 2021 on the Web of Science. In the following, research questions will be answered. In response to these questions, the need for use and examples of the use of collective decision-making is stated. Then, effective factors in collective decision-making are examined and the way to reach a collective decision is explained. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of collective decision-making are discussed and its methods and tools are described. Also, models of collective decision-making are given as a sample and an analysis of the results is provided.

Many organizations and companies are looking for solutions to create regular and formal processes for project management that leads to higher discipline in conducting current projects in terms of time, budget, and quality level. Task description and various goals can be expected based on the needs and characteristics of an organizations, from setup to the project management office deployment. The most important expectation from the project management office is to create regular and integrated processes for project management in the form of a unified project management structure. Accordingly, the present study, using the previous research, aims to identify and explain the dimensions that guide organizations in using project management offices. The identified dimensions are presented as the requirements for the implementation of the project management office project model. In this research, the importance and necessity of the project management office was firstly stated and after expressing theoretical and conceptual models of the project management office, the project management office structure was described. The conceptual model of the research was presented and the elements of the conceptual model was identified. The Likert-scale questionnaire was composed using library and online studies, and was confirmed by the organization experts. To analyze the data, a military research organizations was selected as the case study. Using SPSS software, first the assumption of normal variables was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and then using the t-student’s test, the status of each of the components of the project management office was evaluated. The approved components of the project management office presented in three main components of planning (project portfolio), delivery (plan and project) and the center of excellence in the form of 17 sub-components.

The purpose of this study is to present a method for selection of the most appropriate military technology from among the identified technologies to acquire it through research and development projects. Thus, to accomplish this aim, the research process is designed by merging three topics of evaluation and technology selection, military technology strategies, and research and development projects. The results obtained from this method can be summarized into two types of intermediate and final results. Intermediate results are related to weighting and prioritization of evaluation criteria and selection of military technologies. Based on these results, the criteria for "synchronization with military policies, strategy and guideline", "military deterrence ability", "promotion of national self-confidence and researchers' self-confidence" and also among the grouping regarding the criteria, the group of criteria  of "strategy and operational efficiency" "technology effect" and "creativity and innovation" were acknowledged as the most important criteria for technology selection. In the final results, out of the 5 identified technologies, two technologies were eliminated in the monitoring of the initial evaluation stage, and finally the conditioned technologies according to the selected criteria and using "TOPSIS" method were prioritized as B, D and C, respectively.

One of the issues that minds of researchers and decision makers have in the field of standard and standardization may be busy, the subject of standardization and how it is related to innovation. An issue that has been raised for many years by researcher with different views. It is important to explain this issue that kind of views and analysis of this issue, may deny the basis of standardization and introduce at odds with creativity or strengthen and expand its. This article is one of the research studies and it is trying to provide an analysis in the field of standardization and innovation. The purpose of this article is to answer the question whether standardization is limiting or facilitating innovation? In other words, what kind of relation is between these two categories? This article first discusses the theoretical foundations related to innovation, standardization and standardization and then using research backgrounds and expert opinions, the analytical answer is given to four questions raised in this regard.

In this paper, the researcher is seeking to introduce a suitable model for evaluating the performance of researchers and research centers in research and development organizations. To achieve the pattern, after conducting library and field studies at the Nazca self-sufficiency research organization, the proposed conceptual model was developed using expert opinion and questionnaire tool, the proposed criteria were measured. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for all variables in the questionnaire is more than 0.7 which indicates the high validity of the questionnaire. After analyzing the questionnaire, the conceptual model of research with 4 criteria and 42 indicators for evaluating the performance of researchers and 4 criteria and 20 indicators for evaluating the performance of the research center was finalized. After the initial conceptual pattern is finalized, the significance of each criterion was determined using the AHP hierarchical analysis process. The incompatibility rate for both models was less than 0.1 which is identified using it and designed model has good reliability.