فهرست مطالب محمد جواد صافیان

Since Vattimo's interpretation of Nietzsche requires examining the views of Heidegger and Dilthey as his main points, Therefore, in this article, we intend to first mention Heidegger's interpretation of Nietzsche, as the last metaphysical philosopher of the West, in which Heidegger to justify his goal; which is a re-evaluation of the history and experience of the West, deals with Nietzsche's interpretation. Then, briefly, we discuss Dilthey's interpretation of Nietzsche, as a philosopher of life, in which the closeness of Heidegger's and Nietzsche's thinking is emphasized. In the end, by explaining Vatimo's interpretation of Heidegger's Nietzsche, we show that, contrary to Heidegger's opinion, by examining Nietzsche's interpretation of modern nihilism and its connection with postmodern nihilism, he calls him the first postmodern philosopher. And it shows that it is Nietzsche who should be read as the first postmodern philosopher, not Heidegger, and the reason for these different perceptions and interpretations presented by Nietzsche, itself expresses the sensitive position of Nietzsche's philosophy at the end of metaphysics

History, under the influence of Hegel's thoughts in the 19th century, took a high place. In the following, some historians with a positivist way of thinking proposed the idea of scientific historiography. Based on that, history becomes a definite science and, like natural sciences, it is separated from the researcher's mentalities. The problem starts from here that German historicism, believing in the normative force of history, emphasized the importance that the historian should provide a direction for society and culture by discovering the pure facts and revealing their historical meaning.Based on this idea of history, the social and cultural function of philosophy was challenged. In this chaotic situation that made philosophy face the crisis of identity, Nietzsche's and Dilthey's projects, i.e. the broad and diverse movement of "philosophy of life," became the driving force of the renewal of philosophy in the 19th century.Nietzsche and Dilthey agreed on the issue that comprehensive historiography in its understanding of human beings has created the problem of relativism, which causes "dissolution" and "pessimism" and cannot predict the future of human culture. Therefore, they called for a new philosophy that should reveal the purpose of human culture and support its progress towards reaching its goal. Although they chose a similar path to confirm the cultural authority of philosophy against the results of historical criticism, they arrived at a completely different solution.Nietzsche calls the antidotes against historicism "supra-historical", which includes the art of forgetting history and living in an enclosed and determined horizon; It means having the talent to know when to sense history and when to leave it aside.In his opinion, both of these methods are equally necessary for the health of a person, the health of a nation and culture. Dilthey, unlike Nietzsche, considers history to be an antidote and a cure for the failures of the philosophy of life: If history creates a wound, it must also heal it.

In ‘Allāmah Ṭabāṭabā’ī’s view, poetry and mentally-posited perceptions have such a close relationship with each other that he describes such perceptions through using poetic similes, allegories, and metaphors in his book of The Principles of Philosophy and the Method of Realism. This study explores the relationship between poetry and mentally-posited perceptions through referring to those works of ‘Allāmah Ṭabāṭabā’ī in which he discusses the theory of mentally-posited things. The significance of this relationship lies in the fact that, by investigating the relationship between these two variables in different philosophical, gnostic, and interpretive works of ‘Allāmah, one can inquire about the relationship of poetry and positedness with fact-itself truth. The findings of this study indicate that mentally-posited things are the same as Man’s poetic view of the world or an eye with which Man can see everything. This poetic world, while being irrational and non-inferential, can speak of truth through allusions. Accordingly, it can be claimed that the theory of mentally-posited perceptions in Islamic philosophy has opened a new window to attaining the knowledge of truth.

In this article, Heidegger's phenomenological course on Kant's Thesis about This article has investigated Heidegger’s phenomenological quest of Kant’s thesis about “being.” Heidegger holds that Realität and Dasein in the philosophy of Kant find their roots in the well-known distinction of reality and existence in this philosophical tradition, but based on his philosophical definition and in opposition to their origin, Kant ultimately redefines the two as categories of the faculty of cognition. In this article, therefore, we survey the reduction of “being” to a category in the philosophy of Kant on the basis of Heidegger’s interpretation. Being is one of the categories of modality. By examining this set of categories, the importance of perception, as a institution of receiving the multiplicity of spatial and temporal intuitions (the material of knowledge), will be articulated. Thus, from Kant’s view, the apperception, along with its categories, synthesize these pluralities, of which the result is the position of the thing. For Kant, categories are ontological predicates that are related to the given and result in the appearance of beings by giving unity to the primary datum. Finally, it is concluded that for Kant, being is objectness (Gegenstandigkeit). In other words, everything that is currently in front of us is proved as a result of the unity of the Multiplicity of intuition, i.e., as the result of the synthesis of the Subject, and causes the thing or in its general sense: the object‒ to stand against of us. This is the meaning of the "position" of the object by the Subject.

Undoubtedly, Heraclitus and Parmenides are permanent sources of Heidegger's thought. What has given these two a special place in Heidegger's thought is Heidegger's special conception of the original wisdom of the two and the role of their thinking in opening another path in thought. According to Heidegger making effort to find other beginnings for thought, beginnings which, unlike the conventional beginning of metaphysical history, do not lead to subject-object formulation, is the most urgent task in advancing original thought. In his view, the unattainable nature of the thinking of these thinkers, contrary to Aristotle's picked opinion, is not due to their stuttering and inexperience. Rather, it is because the beginning in its originality has become more apparent than anywhere else in the thoughts of these thinkers. In the interim, according to Heidegger Logos of Heraclitus has a privileged situation.  Thus, the correct interpretation of the Logos of Heraclitus reveals to us aspects of the original beginning of thought. In this article, we go along with Heidegger's interpretation of this fundamental concept of Heraclitus' thought in order to get closer to this fundamental research question: What is the place of the Logos in Heraclitus' thought and how can it be prologue of another beginning?

The article considers Heidegger's reflections on Holderlin's poetic thought from the perspective of fundamental intention to the other. After the departure of Western philosophies from their original application, these issues came to the forefront of Western thinkers. If it is no longer possible to defend the application of Western philosophy and civilization, how can one see the other? Western thinkers, including Heidegger, took the question so seriously that after asking it, they began to take new ways of thinking in order to seek more original beginnings. In this article, we follow Heidegger's efforts to follow this path in the light of what he himself called “Holderlin's poetic thinking”. Undoubtedly, from Heidegger's point of view, poetry, contrary to the notion of metaphysical thought, which places it at a lower level than philosophical conceptualization, is the original position in which the genuine revelation of the world is possible. In this original revelation, Heidegger seeks the possibility of transcending the dominant criterion of Western tradition, the subject-object criterion. As long as the other is presented as inanimate object devoid of any kind of distinction, what remains of the encounter with the other is merely a pale specter of otherness that hardly signifies the other's truth. So the guiding questions of this article are how to reside beside the other in the light of Holderlin's poetic thinking? What possibilities does poetic thinking provide for the original intention to the other?

Schilling's treatise on The Philosophical Studies of the Essence of Human freedom (1809) is an attempt to establish a system of freedom. The most central concept in Schelling's system is the concept of "identity", which, with its correct interpretation and finding unity between the opposing concepts of freedom and necessity, justifies his main concern in the theory of absolute idealism. The principle that is pursued in the fundamental search for the formation of the system and the solution for the compatibility of the system and freedom is identity in the true sense that in pantheism as the only possible system of reason is possible. Heidegger's focus on Schelling's thought Revealed the importance of Schelling in the history of Western thought by writing Schelling's Treaties on the Essence of Human Freedom and his multiple interpretations in 1936 and 1941. This study shows how, according to Schelling, a misinterpretation of this principle allows the incompatibility of system and freedom in different interpretations of pantheism, and how Heidegger's interpretation of this principle leads to the question of what is the single and fundamental principle of beings.

:The possibility of the system and its will as a way of rediscovering human the being is characteristic of the modern age. In Schelling’s Treaties on the Essence of Human Freedom (1936), Heidegger, by asking what the system is and comparing it to German idealism, considers the conditions necessary for the formation of the system in order to understand the intellectual foundation of the modern age. Through the concept of the system, the jointure of which is determined on the basis of mathematical order and subjective foundations, Heidegger uses the concept of the system as the jointure of the order of being. Research on the formation of the system and the question of the possibility of a system of freedom is also the main issue of Schelling in his treatise on The Philosophical Studies of the Essence of Human Freedom (1809). The purpose of this research is to analyze Heidegger’s interpretation of the concept of system by emphasizing the principle of identity in Schelling’s system of freedom. The present article considers two questions: How does Schelling’s attempt to eliminate the existing misinterpretations of this principle in the various interpretations of the pantheism provide the possibility of the compatibility of the freedom system? In Heidegger’s interpretation, how does Schelling’s reading of the necessity of paying attention to “is” lead to an ontological question of the meaning and truth of being in German idealism, how does the question of the system changes in the way the structure of beings is connected in general?

The purpose of this study is to achieve a new reading of thinking with a caring approach, citing the story of Moses (PBUH) and Khezr (PBUH) in the Qur'an in order to teach caring thinking and based on the five elements of this thinking, namely thinking, emotional thinking, thinking Active, normative thinking and empathetic thinking are based on the teachings of philosophy for children. Regarding the findings of this study, citing verses 60 to 82 of Surah Al-Kahf and descriptive method and qualitative content analysis with interpretive approach, the above story, which itself contains three instructive and thought-provoking stories of the teacher-student type and also having The characteristics of questions and answers in the text of the story and the challenges in the path of gaining experience, learning and evolutionary development of the character of Prophet Moses (PBUH) at the end of the story, listed it among the stories with the presence of caring thinking factors and education through it. It seems that the study of such stories of emotional and intellectual dialogues, which are the components of caring thinking from the perspective of philosophy for children, plays an important role in the growth and development of this kind of thinking in children. We come to caring thinking, first to understand what we think and second to how we think.

Place is the most fundamental concept in architecture and is a necessity of architectural design, and since we face changes in our understanding of place notion in the modern era which have had distinctly profound and sometimes unpleasant effects on modern and subsequent designs- in a way that architecture has largely neglected its primary task of making the noble place of human life, and its responsibility in human dwelling dimension- in order to find the roots of the evolution in place nature and its meaning, we will answer these two question: what the concept of place has been for ancient thinkers? What have been the reasons for changing the understanding of place in the modern era? How these changes have affected the understanding of place in modern architecture? and yet we will try to understand the concepts of place in ancient Greece (as the origin of western thoughts especially modern thinking) versus the modern, and finally the main findings of this study are the massive semantic transformation of place in modern age and its replacement by space in modern architecture design which mainly is the result of major attention paid to the extendedness of place, the emergence of functionalism in degradation of place, and the commercialization of place.

Freud's approach toward understanding art is limited to some factors. He overemphasizes the neural aspects of artistic experience. His analysis of artists, to a great extent, depends on his need to expand and indicate the psychoanalytic theory he was working on. He confessed that he failed to confront art's official and technical aspects, and psychoanalysis has not yet been able to realize the artist's intrinsic "secret" and "mysterious ability" in creating a work of art. Freud investigated the artist's individual unconscious for the origin of creating a work of art. Freud's view of art can be seen as a continuation of the modern aesthetic view of art and at the same time expresses its criticality. We are faced with a different approach to art and the beginning of a work of art. In this approach, Heidegger sees the beginning of the work of art as separate from the artist and his personal life and tries to connect art with the truth. On this basis, he gives a new interpretation of art. This study explored the foundations, components, and assumptions of psychoanalytic interpretation of art. According to Heidegger, one of the places where truth is realized is in art. Moreover, based on Heideggerian thought on art and poetic thought, this study examined the strengths and weaknesses of psychoanalytic interpretation of art and attempted to explore the relationship between art and truth in psychoanalytic interpretation and Heidegger's interpretation of art.

In managing the crisis of the Covid-19 pandemic, what is most heard is the emphasis on keeping your distance from the others. But whether this spacing could make changes over time in the usual behavioral norms? Could we reconstruct and renovate this various broken rules and norms which like narrative plots had the role of unification?  In this paper, we would analyze the crisis of the relation of the self to the other within this situation. We explain Ricoeur's epistemological approach towards the relation of the self to the other in the light of the concepts of ethics and social responsibility. Then, on the bisis of Ricour's theory of practical wisdom, we try to show some possibilities for encountering the crisis of this relationship in the pandemic situation. By grafting the concept of law onto the ethics through the practical wisdom, we obligate oneself to the order of political institution as an interior command which is the call of conscious. This call is an ethical order from the others within us. It could arise the hope that people and political institutions cooperate with each other to pass the current crisis.

Art and technology are concepts that Heidegger has addressed in separate articles (The Beginning of Artwork and The Question of Technology). This article seeks to examine the relationship between these two concepts in Heidegger's idea. He believes that art is a kind of emergence and manifestation of the truth. In discussing technology, he introduces technique, and then examines the concept of "tekhneh" in ancient Greece, where art and technology are rooted. This article clarifies Heidegger's method of analysis, i.e. hermeneutic phenomenology, and his analysis of truth, the relationship of each of the concepts of art and technology with it in ancient and contemporary Greece, and the relationship between art and technology in the light of truth. The research methods used in this paper are basic(pure) and content analysis. The purpose of this study is to examine the current position of art in the contemporary technology era.

Surrealists’ paintings are covered in puzzle-like images informed by a juxtaposition of fantasy and reality. They sought to combine dream and reality to unleash the untold hidden in their subconscious through creation of novel effects. The work of art chosen for review in this study is Magritte's The Human Condition (La condition humaine) painting. René Magritte has created two paintings with this same title,‌ the image of both of which are included in the article. The one addressed in this study is the painting depicting a room and the landscape visible through a window. In the first glance,‌ we see a landscape outside the window in the room. Through further examination,‌ however,‌ we realize that a part of the landscape is in fact a painting on canvas on a tripod. Which makes one wonder,‌ what was Magritte's purpose in creating this painting? Was he trying to create a puzzle? Was he aiming to mock the mind and perception of the spectator? Or is this something beyond a mind game? Therefore,‌ this study attempted to critically examine and conduct a phenomenological assessment of this painting. Through a deeper analysis and epoché on this painting,‌ it can be seen that it is more of a picture in picture puzzle than a depiction. Similar to other prominent artists,‌ René Magritte tried to create a universe to point us in the direction of a hidden truth behind the images; a truth that is understandable in the life of today's human beings.

Heidegger is one of the first thinkers that paid to technological being position, it's soul and it's ratio to art and poetry. These days technical age characteristics casts a shadow over all of people's life aspects, and the new technical essence (Ge-stell), is looking at all of things as a disiplined fixed source, waiting to be used. The question is that in affected societies from modern technology, what relationship can be established between technology and poetry. We will examine it from Hiedeggers paint of view.  Has poetry been able to maintain its place in the past? and is kind of com forting gift or a higher position shuld be considered for it?.In this article with descriptive analysis method referring to technical essence from Heidegger views it will try to  interpret, connection and ratio between technology and poetry so that article prove that if we let 's look to the realm of the original art, the resulting development, it belongs to poetry and  it help to truth development. Poet can overcomes (Ge-stell). With original speech.

When we encounter with literary texts, works of art and films which are full of the relations of metaphors, narratives and actions, this important question maybe asked that how is their relationship and how it could be related to our understanding? In the present article, we will discuss Ricoeur's ideas concerning this problem.. Our thesis is that understanding in Ricoeur's thought is metaphoric, narrative and actual in nature. The metaphoric character of understanding will be shown on the basis of the "as" structure and seeing similarities simultaneous with differences. In his idea narration and plot are, like metaphor, gathering the differences with similarities and regulating them as unity. Ricoeur believes that narrative innovation with its referral to reality could be the origin of action and indicate the relation of action to understanding. Thus metaphor, narrative and action are the intrinsic aspects of understanding which are closely and fundamentally related to each other. As, In the area of hermeneutics, he extends the concept of text and its understanding beyond just writing, analyzing this theme will inform us the importance of the way of encountering different kinds of texts.

The Philosophical Investigations into the Essence of Human Freedom (1809) is the most coherent form of Schelling’s attempt to describe the absolute system or the system of freedom. For the first time in the twentieth century, with Heidegger's careful reference to his treatise on freedom and his repeated commentary in 1936 and 1941, the importance of this treatise in the history of Western thought became apparent. Heidegger focuses on Schilling’s thinking, especially with Schilling’s treatise on the Essence of Human Freedom, research into the formation of the system, and the question of the possibility of a system of freedom as a question of the essence of being. Schilling bases his research on the system of freedom on a correct ontological basis in order to transcend formal freedom as an independent determinant of mechanical causation and to achieve the true definition of freedom as the ability to do good and evil. And after proposing the inadequacy of formal freedom in the idealist systems before it, it introduces the real and living concept of freedom as the ability to do good and evil. Heidegger demonstrates the independence of the Schelling system in comparison with the Fichte and Hegel systems, and his innovations in response to issues such as evil, freedom, identity, and the relation of being and “is” are most evident in the metaphysical realm of the will; however, remaining within the metaphorical framework also prevents Schilling from approaching the question of the truth of existence. Schilling’s important issue is the elimination of the opposition between freedom and necessity, which, in his view, is the focus of philosophy. For this reason, the discussion of freedom is at the heart of the system in its true sense, and in his opinion, his dissertation is for the first time the design of a system based on the idea of human freedom. The possibility of a system of freedom must be created in accordance with the principle of identity, which does not ignore the meaning of the relation of theology. In Schelling’s Heideggerian interpretation of the principle of identity, the priority of ontological issues in matters of theological nature such as all theism is given more importance and the question of all theism as a question of the system to the question of “is” and how to connect the structure of beings as a whole. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Heidegger’s interpretation of the concept of the system of freedom according to Schelling with emphasis on the ontological distinction between ground and existence. This study seeks to answer these two questions: how does the design of the real concept of freedom open the way to explain the ontological foundation of the possibility of evil and the possibility of freedom in the system? Also, how does the distinction between ground and existence lead to Schelling's main goal in resolving the conflict between system and freedom? Moreover, according to Heidegger, to what extent does this distinction arise from Schilling’s metaphysical and subject-centered thinking?

The notion of the characteristics of an ignoble human being in Gabriel Marcel thought revolves around components such as establishing an "I - s/he" relationship with others, unpreparedness and unopenness in relations with others, and presence in the realm of "having." To that end, it will become clear that by establishing an "I-you" relationship, being present to other human beings in the realm of "being" becomes noble, but by examining Marcelchr ideas it became clear that the dominance of science and technology over human beings paved the way for the formation of a mass society and further, it intensifies the functional view of human, and as a result all these factors, increases the intensity and speed of ignobility of contemporary mankind. In this study, which aimed to explain the factors of nobelity and ignobility from Gabriel Marcelchr point of view, it became clear that he believes to emerge from unoriginality. a human being should be able to freely choose, to accept responsibility, to communicate with the secret and to have characteristics such as love, loyalty, faith and hope.

Understanding oneself has been of great importance in various areas of thought and discussed from different aspects. Some thinkers believe that self-understanding is intuitive and others consider it to be reflective and interpretative. In the history of western thought, especially in the areas of hermeneutics and phenomenology, Heidegger and Ricoeur are representative of these two different approaches. From this perspective we entitle their views as ontological and semantics. In this writing, we try to elaborate the ontological view point of Heidegger and the semantic approach of Ricoeur concerning the problem of self-understanding in order to pursue the possibility of any graft between them. For revealing the possibility of this graft, we focus on two aspects; We show that: 1- Self-understanding in Heidegger's and Ricoeur's thought be realized within the common horizons of "time", "language" and "the other", though, through different approaches of ontology and epistemology; and 2- For these three horizons in Ricoeur's definition of them, we can define an ontological foundation within the structure of  dasein.  It seem that this ontological basis can be considered to be at the beginning of Ricoeur's epistemological long route. In this regard, we can graft fundamentally these two approaches onto each other.

Human life is inevitably linked with the environment and nature. Water, air, food, etc all are guarantors of the survival of human life and activities on earth. Humans reside on the earth, and so their dependence on the earth and other beings is supposed to be all other proportions of them. But mostly the relation gradually ends up neglecting one side, the environment, and using it as a resource in favor of human on the other side. This relation is based on the dominant thinking of the subject-object and neglect of other environmental values. The continuation of this situation will seriously damage the life of the earth and all beings. Martin Heidegger, a contemporary German philosopher who considers the history of Western thought as a history of neglect of being, believed that the deep roots of the current human relationship with nature and environmental crisis are in the particular perception of beings according to which beings are considered as mere human’s objects for domination of them. Heidegger considers such a relation to beings and the whole of nature as a subjective relation and attempts to solve the problem by means of the question of being and dwelling in the earth on the basis of friendship and the negation of dualism.

The question of the essence of beauty and how the ancient architectural spaces of this land are revealed to their audiences as beautiful works is an important question that has always been of interest to scholars and thinkers in this field. This study is intended to rethink this issue from a different perspective, yet more fundamental. By formulating and applying Heidegger's phenomenological method of thinking, we strive to take the path of greater revelation and a deeper reflection on the essence of beauty in one of the beautiful architectural spaces of the past. In this regard, the illumination of the aesthetic essence is achieved not by conceptual thinking but by reference to the architectural work itself. We read the naghshe jahan square as one of the most beautiful works of Isfahan in the Safavid era to answer the question that how does naghshe jahan square manifest itself in the emotions and aesthetic experience of its audience? Finally, the interpretation of the audience's aesthetic experiences revealed for the audiences some elements, including freewill, consolatory, sanctity, honesty, spirituality, life, illumination, novelty, and logic, which represents that the naghshe jahan square is being revealed to the audiences as an artistic, humane, naturalistic, functional, ethical and memorable work and creates a beautiful and enjoyable experience for them.

Hermeneutical phenomenology is a philosophical approach which is emerged from the compound of two important attitudes in the continental philosophy. Heidegger (1889-1976), who is considered as a founder of hermeneutical phenomenology, makes a conjunction between these two attitudes innovatively. This task is influenced by Husserl's phenomenological requirements concerning the sense and interpretation and his known slogan, toward the things itself. After Heidegger, Ricoeur (1913-2005) who is influenced by the concept of epoche in Husserl's phenomenology, makes such a conjunction in an innovative way. The difference between their views is that Heidegger, in Ricoeur's statement, follows the short route taken for ontological analysis of dasein, and Ricoeur proposes a long detour, starting with semantic considerations within the analysis of symbolic expressions of the human being. The basic thesis for present research is to show that, despite of different approaches in Heidegger and Ricoeur's thought toward this subject, in both views ''understanding'' can be considered as one of the most important requirements of the possibility of this connection. Their common viewpoint about ''understanding'' could be considered as a good reason for this claim. The importance of proving this thesis is that we can then by scrutinizing all the implications of understanding, find a vast area of possibilities in this conjunction that open lots of horizons in hermeneutics, epistemology, ontology and phenomenology which help us toward the way of truth.

After his so-called period of Kehre, Heidegger sought to pursue his thought of truth of being in a poetic or thinking-led mode of thought. The outcome of this effort was the development of some concepts and terms that are considered illogical in contemporary philosophical discourses and are described as mystical notions. Geviert or Fourfold is one of these terms that has played a key role in the philosophy of Later Heidegger. In 1950 and 1951 Heidegger delivered two lectures entitled "Das Ding" and "Bauen, Wohnen, Denken". In these lectures, he seeks to reflect on Geviert focusing on two notions of Das Ding and Wohnen and casts light on their relationship with the discussion of the Truth of Being. In this paper, we try to provide an analysis of Geviert and its place in Later Hiedegger's being-historical thinking.